Senator Grassley asks for Answers on Amerithrax Investigation

On August 7, 2008 Senator Grassley wrote to Attorney General Mukasey and FBI Director Mueller asking them to answer 18 excellent questions about their investigation.

Similar Posts

How to watch the 4th Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-an-interdisciplinary-symposium-iv-freedom-is-the-cure My first talk on anthrax, Emergent BioSolutions and the biodefense industry starts at 2 hrs 46 minutes 30 seconds. I am also on the panel after the talk. My second talk starts at 5 hours 35 seconds.  It is about how to win against the Great Reset.  I emphasize the need to call out…

Godfather Fauci says, “Give me that and I’d be really happy” after just describing the characteristics of ivermectin! If he can kill a few hundred thousand without blinking an eye, what else can you call him?

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkMhqswIc20&t=107s Fauci is asked about his ideal drug for Covid.  And he lists these characteristics as his “Optimal Profile:” a pill that block a viral function oral, not injected minimal drug-drug interactions use for 7–10 days low toxicity He points out you should  “take it early in the disease” and “if you can keep that…

Ebola: worldwide dissemination risk and response priorities/ The Lancet

This piece in the Lancet, authored by Cowling and Yu, discusses issues of Ebola dissemination and means to reduce spread to other countries.  Its final paragraph discusses what we do not yet know, but need to learn: There are several important near-future research needs. Perhaps most urgent is a better understanding of the effectiveness of…

Coming Clean. The best and most touching meander on the vaccine wars. Don’t miss it.

This article happens to have been written by the son of a friend, but I read it all the way through because it is amazing.  I think it can spark a conversation that will help mend our families–Meryl Coming Clean My experience of the pandemic in South Africa and the case for a more inclusive…

Frequent Boosters Spur Warning on Immune Response/ Bloomberg. Bad news and good news

I knew bad news on the vaccines was going to break soon, given the admissions by Pfizer and BioNTech CEOs that their vaccines didn’t work, and they were not encouraging on the booster doses either.  Below is the bad news for boosters.  Hopefully the kill shot. The good news is that antivirals work against COVID,…

6 Comments

  2. Dr. Nass,

    I found 2 articles implying that even the CIA had Ames anthrax prior to the 2001 attacks (not sure whether or not it was RMR-1029):

    http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/capitalhillanthraxarmy.html

    http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/ciadeniesanthraxsource.html

    Also, as of December 2001, the FBI was not investigating Dugway Proving Ground, even though that facility did make dry, weaponized anthrax:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/dec/14/anthrax.uk

    I’ve heard that in 2002, FBI director Mueller confirmed that neither Dugway or Battelle Memorial Institute were being investigated, although I haven’t been able to confirm that fact yet.

  3. Some people seem to take Dr. Ivins’ “suicide” as proof of a guilty conscience. But if it were so clear that Dr. Ivins did commit suicide, then why is the Government still searching Fredrick County Public Library computers for evidence of a suicide note? (See Affidavit in support of Search Warrant dated August 07, 2008 at http://www.usdoj.gov/amerithrax/08-496%20affidavit.pdf)

  4. "[T]wo doctors who came over from the Soviet Union and work at the facility [where Dr. Ivins worked] think the FBI's behavior is worse than the KGB." ("Fort Detrick Scientist: Ivins Innocent, FBI Worse Than KGB!" http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:k0QBx_DEnW8J:www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi%3FArtNum%3D3261+ivins+kgb+fbi&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us)

    I would just add this. We don't know whether Dr. Ivins did, or did not, intentionally kill himself. We do know that he was running out of money to keep paying lawyers; and that he had two children in college.

    Suppose, just suppose, Dr. Ivins was actually innocent. Suppose that he had been told by his lawyers and others, that the truth would come out eventually. Suppose even further that he believed in his country, and since he knew he was innocent, he believed with great certainty that the real culprits would ultimately be caught.

    He knew that if things continued as they were going he would be bankrupt in a matter of months, leaving his wife with no money and no home, and his children with no college education. And unlike the situation with Dr. Hatfill, the FBI had been careful not to publicly label him as “a person of interest”. So in his case, there wouldn’t be any rainbow, or any gold at the end.

    Is it a great stretch to imagine Dr. Ivins might have believed his loved ones would be better off without him?

  6. George Washington might be able to come up with another excellent blog post with the information in thse videos.

    Number 8 has to do with The anthrax Vaccine. I strongly recommend all videos be watched entirely.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8df9-oADP_c
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrwTciHIpEQ
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGsIenVqSDU
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_rXmKEPeLo
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiHqGfWytkU
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGUn99XHB30
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qQ4dHKgRjs
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_E5ogvOAWA
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbc0I2KKCk8
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-uJ7v3NvMs
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaeAWanF27g
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l13q4hbe3-A
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tM8gk8C69M
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jf_szoJEP6o
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMGz-hzORUo

Comments are closed.