CDC took down its poster on aerosol spread–but here it is

Similar Posts

The Jynneos label reveals various unpleasant truths: up to 20 mcg of chicken DNA and 0.5 mg chicken protein injected per dose, and considerable cardiac effects

Below I have excerpted from the label for Jynneos.  In a nutshell,  1) there is no evidence to support using this vaccine in pregnancy, lactation or children.  There is no information on male (as well as female) fertility effects or carcinogenicity. 2) About 2% of recipients had a serious adverse event 3) According to the…

WA launches flu vaccine inquiry / Sydney Morning Herald

From the SMH (Good on ya, Ozzies, for taking this seriously’): The West Australian government has launched an inquiry into the flu vaccinations that caused adverse reactions in hundreds of children across the nation. WA Health Minister Kim Hames said the inquiry would scrutinise systems used to identify public health risks, including vaccine side-effects and…

Bill for more investigation of ’01 anthrax case passes House

From the Baltimore Sun: A measure requiring further federal investigation into the 2001anthrax attack that killed five people was approved Thursday by the House of Representatives. It was proposed by two skeptics of a recently closed FBI probe that blamed the deadly attacks on Bruce Ivins, a microbiologist at the Army biodefense lab at Fort…

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19/ Johns Hopkins Newsletter-CENSORED

This detailed article about the research findings of a JHU professor goes against the narrative that Covid has caused a large number (2-300,000) of excess US deaths. It received a huge amount of interest, and was published and then taken down by this student-run newsletter. I must assume, given this, that the research is never…

How governments fool you into thinking you have given a legal consent, when you haven’t

Half the country has been induced to undergo an illegal procedure (becoming an experimental subject without informed consent) by federal and state governments. The government has knowingly violated the law.  The law says that subjects cannot be offered valuable benefits to participate as a research subject, nor can they be coerced. The law says an…

One Comment

  1. Yes, this is the one I was referencing in the post above this one (I am reading down the blog).

    I didn't realize they took it down (though I surely realize why they did as it's horrible). I showed it to many physicians, nurses, and other public health professionals and after reading not a single one of them could tell me the difference between the two (because based on their reasoning herein, there isn't really a difference).

    Actually, to be fair, there is a difference, but it's literally for about <1 second when tiny droplets are expelled into the air, evaporate, then become a germ floating in the air (which is CDC's definition of "airborne").

    Also, here's that great MIT article on fluid dynamics showing that sneezes aerosolize and go 20 feet and get into ventilation systems if they're of a particular size.

    o Bourouiba, L., Dehandschoewercker, E., & Bush, J. W. (2014). Violent expiratory events: on coughing and sneezing. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 745, 537-563.

    http://math.mit.edu/~bush/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Sneezing-JFM.pdf

    A much bigger article needs to be written about all this…there's just so much misleading/confusing information going out.

Comments are closed.