Are Covid Vaccines Riskier Than Advertised?/ WSJ

4 Comments

1. Public-health authorities are making a mistake and risking the public’s trust by not being forthcoming about the possibility of harm from certain vaccine side effects.

   Four serious adverse events stand out, according to VAERS: low platelets (thrombocytopenia); noninfectious myocarditis, or heart inflammation, especially for those under 30; deep-vein thrombosis; and death. Prior research has shown that only a fraction of adverse events are reported, so the true number of cases is much higher.

   The silence around these potential signals of harm reflects the politics surrounding Covid-19 vaccines. Stigmatizing such concerns is bad for scientific integrity and could harm patients. The CDC and FDA are surely aware of this data, yet both agencies have refused to publicly acknowledge the signals – while still pushing the Death VAX on a brainwashed public.. There will be serious consequences from serving political objectives, not medical needs, during the management of a public-health crisis.

   The battle to recover honesty will be an uphill one in the USA. Since the spring of 2020 social-media censorship has mushroomed, and news reporting often lacked intellectual curiosity about the appropriateness of public-health behavior – or why a vocal group of Doctors and scientists were in strong disagreement with WHO/CDC/NIH/NIAID actions.

   The VAERS data shows that the risks of a mRNA vaccines has been severely, likely intentionally, under estimated. For example, while you would never know it from listening to public-health officials, not a single published study has demonstrated that patients with a prior Covid infection benefit from mRNA vaccination. That this isn’t readily acknowledged by the CDC or Anthony Fauci is an indication of how deeply pandemic science has been corrupted. These people have sold their souls for 30 pieces of silver. Even their families should disown and shun them.

   The very clear implication of the VAERS data, which is being held back to hide the severity of the issues, is that the risks of a mRNA vaccine already far outweighs the benefits for certain low-risk populations, such as children, pregnant women, young adults, and people who have recovered from Covid-19. And with the recent revelations that the toxic spike protein actually travels to the brain, heart, lungs, ovaries, testes, spleen and bone marrow – the true risk to every recipients health, to their very lives really, will just grow over time. Lastly, if the “self-spreading” nature of these mRNA products is true – we all will be at risk from the vaccine, without informed consent.

   That politics, or other nefarious agendas, is driving healthcare management by the US public health agencies is one of the darkest moments in American history. That the US government has not ordered a full, immediate, cessation of the nRNA vaccine program will be recorded as the greatest crime against humanity in the history of this world.

   FULL STOP

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j7am9kjMrk

   Best ivermectin meta analysis

3. Since covid-vax: Number of VAERS reports to the CDC have gone through the roof.

   About 60,000 VAERS reports were submitted in 2019, the previous high water mark; of those, about 48,000 VAERS were processed.

   In 2021, so far, as of June 18, as reported today, June 25, 2021, there are 540,299 reports submitted.

   Of these, 376,299 VAERS have been processed to date, for 2021, or about ten times the average of the previous decade.

   This is a signal to any rational person; except the CDC pretends otherwise.

   Some of the CDC officials and those serving their advisory boards have admitted at public meetings they have not reviewed this data, and yet the agency website claims they have found no "causal link."

   This is exact same language cigarette manufacturers used for decades to evade responsibility for dangers of smoking, the exact same language.

   And they got away with it simply because it was not feasible to do a double blind random study, with a group of smokers and non smokers, and follow them over 20 or more years, to make any "causal link", or not, determination.

   Is the CDC looking for "signals" which they claim in some of their public statements, or causal links, or what is blatantly apparent: peddling to us pure, unadulterated bull shit?

   "Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. More than 318 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through June 21, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 5,479 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. . . .A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines."

   https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html

   A review of clinical information? What does this mean?

   At the meeting earlier this week with the CDC advisory panel, they kept saying they want to collect more and more data — yet there is no commitment to processing this data in any meaningful scientific manner.

   There is no institutional governmental interest at this time to examine this.

   Neither in Washington nor the 50 shades of state public health departments in the US.

   Can't we find at least one state attorney general, somewhere, to investigate this, since AG Merrick Garland is as useless as balls on a Bishop?

   We don't need blue ribbon commissions; we need indictments and grand juries to get accountability for this horrendous crime still in progress.

   -30-

4. i am sharing this link and comment far and wide. great thanks. lynn b

Comments are closed.