The FDA’s “approval” of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine is a Bait and Switch that makes mandates illegal
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/
2 Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine
Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.
Monday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine.
The press reported that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has now requiredthe vaccine for all teachers and school staff. The Pentagon is proceeding with its mandate for all military service members.
But there are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency’s cynicism.
First, the FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer has insufficient stocks of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available, there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine — produced under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) — available for use.
The FDA decrees that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product.
Second, the FDA pointed out that both the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine, and the existing vaccine are “legally distinct,” but proclaims that their differences do not “impact safety or effectiveness.”
There is a huge real-world difference between products under an EUA compared with those that FDA has fully licensed. EUA products are experimental under US law.
Both the Nuremberg Code and Federal Regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.
U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.
EUA-authorized vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.
The government has created an extremely stingy compensation program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, to redress injuries from all EUA products.
But why Federal Judges did let hospital and universities to mandate and dismissed cases?
"EUA-licensed vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield… "
Isn't this a misstatement? EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation) vaccines are not licensed; they're merely authorised for emergency use. As the article takes pains to spell out, such vaccines are NOT licensed, so they cannot be mandated.
Would you please clarify the quoted passage.
Thanks.
It looks like the vaccine factsheet that the FDA wrote for Comiraty is instead being handed out to recipients if the old EUA product.
https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
1.) They got everybody to have a vaxx that in fact drops your immunity relative too diseases because that is what ADE really is.
2.) Now they plan to force vaccinate everybody into that same appalling position even locking up unvaxxed if they refuse because they refused to take the vaxx.
Their only cover left now is to remove any control group left and that is the unvaxxed but even that is not going to hide it. Every textbook will now have to be rewritten to say blood clotting is normal, that masks block viruses and social distancing works against respiratory diseases.
All because of Gates, Fauci and the Davos crowd because they want this planet for themselves.
You're pretty close, except that Gates, Fauci, Devos are only minions for the international banking cartel behind this.
Thank you for your willingness to speak out.
Could you please clarify where in the Nuremberg Code Sec 360bbb it gives us the right to refuse? I am seeing a long explanation of what the authorization for medical products used in emergencies entails, but I am not seeing where it gives us a right to refuse in the face of an emergency. I live in Oregon and have a son and husband about to lose their jobs. I would love this clarification please. Thank you so much for your in depth research!