The Australian Academy of Science provides climate truth with one hand, while demanding the truth be censored with the other hand

globally averaged near-surface air temperature rose by around 0.8°C [1.4 degrees Farenheit] between 1850 and 2012
(Figure 2.1c). The rate of warming increased in the mid-1970s, and each
of the most recent three decades has been warmer than all preceding
decades since 1850. The last decade has been the warmest of these….

The
temperature of the oceans has also risen. More than 90% of the total
heat accumulated in the climate system between 1971 and 2010 has been
stored in the oceans. The greatest ocean warming has taken place close
to the surface, with the upper 75 m of the ocean warming by an average of 0.11°C each decade between 1971 and 2010….

The
average surface temperatures over the Australian continent and its
surrounding oceans have increased by nearly 1°C since the beginning of
the 20th century [1.8 degrees F in 120 years—Nass].

Does that seem like a dire emergency?

However, the Australian Academy of Science last month begged the tech giants to censor misinformation and disinformation, especially on climate change. Here is what the Australian Academy of Science wrote. Yet this was clearly not written by real scientists:

“Anti-scientific content abounds online, with climate science being an area of particular concern.

Despite
a well-established evidence base for anthropogenic climate change, and
the efforts of organisations including the AAS to provide accessible
online resources to communicate this information (e.g. AAS, 2021),
climate science denial content proliferates on social media globally…

Research
into Twitter content found the phrase “fake news” in more than half of
the top 500 most retweeted posts contained climate change denialism, or
the belief that climate change is not anthropogenic (Al-Rawi, O’Keefe,
Kane, & Bizimana, 2021). These included tweets that attributed the
cause of Australia’s 2019/20 bushfires to arson rather than being
associated with the changing climate.
Climate denialism is just one example of how misinformation results in societal harm.

Disinformation on health matters
(such as false and misleading vaccination, sexual and reproductive
health information), or ecological and environmental matters (such as
material misrepresenting studies of coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef) are a barrier to good policy and a healthy society. Even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic there were clear links between climate denialism and anti-vaccine movements (Hamilton,
Hartter & Saito, 2015). The Code must therefore consider broader
instances of misinformation and disinformation, including in
issues-based advertising in all areas, especially climate change.”

Coincidentally, this was published one day before the Washington Post ran a long piece on how Australia’s Great Barrier Reef now has more live coral than it has had in decades. Oops.

It is of course sickening for any “science” body to try and censor scientific discussion.

But
beyond that, we can clearly see that the new meme of ‘misinformation
and disinformation,’ which I was accused of when my medical license was
suddenly suspended in Janary, is to be used globally to suppress not
only medical knowledge, but other types of knowledge. Welcome to the
new global Dark Ages.

UPDATE Sept. 26:   Former head of Australia’s Climate Center disputes the CO2/carbon footprint/carbon credits hypothesis of climate change.

A new paper
on the so-called ‘greenhouse’ effect highlights the vital role played
by oceans and water vapour flows. CO2 is said to have “minimal effect”
on the Earth’s temperature and climate.

The paper has been published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and is written
by meteorologist William Kininmonth, a former consultant to the World
Meteorological Organisation’s Commission for Climatology and former head
of the Australian Government’s National Climate Centre.
Kininmonth argues that the oceans are the “vital inertial and thermal
flywheels” of the climate system. If one wants to control climate, it
will be necessary to control the oceans, he argues. “Efforts to decarbonise in the hope of affecting global temperatures will be in vain,” he adds.