WEF twists the meaning of words to make austerity sound desirable. I start the conversation about climate change
term Climate Change lacks meaning. It is always hotter or colder,
wetter or drier than the last season. The term used to be Global
Warming, but when the warming slowed down, the PTB segued smoothly and
without explanation to Climate Change, and somehow managed to make
everyone think it meant the same thing. As it became clear that
temperatures were starting to go down, the PTB made another pivot to
atmospheric carbon dioxide as ‘the Problem.’ But we don’t actually know
whether high levels of CO2 are a problem. The elevated CO2 does help
plants more easily trap carbon and grow larger. James Corbett has been on this scam for awhile. He is a wonderful teacher about what is really happening.
The
heating of the planet from about 1960 to 2000 occurred reasonably fast,
as if it was starting up from the low point on a sine wave, as 1960 was
relatively cold. There is some confirmation of this in a Royal Society
publication
of 1966. It noted that there was a warming in the early part of the
20th century, followed by a distinct cold weather trend around 1960. I
like this article on the Australian Academy of Science website, which says
globally averaged near-surface air temperature rose by around 0.8°C between 1850 and 2012
(Figure 2.1c). The rate of warming increased in the mid-1970s, and each
of the most recent three decades has been warmer than all preceding
decades since 1850. The last decade has been the warmest of these….The
temperature of the oceans has also risen. More than 90% of the total
heat accumulated in the climate system between 1971 and 2010 has been
stored in the oceans. The greatest ocean warming has taken place close
to the surface, with the upper 75 m of the ocean warming by an average of 0.11°C each decade between 1971 and 2010….The
average surface temperatures over the Australian continent and its
surrounding oceans have increased by nearly 1°C since the beginning of
the 20th century.
Does that seem like a dire emergency?
However, the Australian Academy of Science last month begged the tech giants to censor misinformation and disinformation on climate change. The same language used to silence doctors. The international language of suppression of anything but the single narrative.
Now
we expect cooling due to decreased sun spot activity and other factors
over the next ten years, so the focus has shifted to CO2 rather than
planetary warming.
Creating a fake global threat of planetary
annihilation from a natural cycle’s vicissitudes was bold and brazen.
Meteorologists who did not drink and expel the Koolaid lost their jobs.
USG weather statistics were corrupted, which it seems is very easy to
accomplish nowadays. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
which Maurice Strong formed, took care of getting out a single cohesive
message. I currently rely on the Australian Academy of Science for my
facts, but how long will they last?
James Corbett took a peek behind the curtain to identify Maurice Strong
as the main inventor of the Global Warming scam and most of the world’s
environmental movement. Strong ran the UN’s first 1972 Conference on
the Environment and its 1992 Rio Earth Summit. As James Corbett develops the history:
David
Rockefeller was there with Strong in Colorado in 1987 for the “Fourth
World Wilderness Congress,” a meeting of world-historical importance
that almost no one has even heard of. Attended by the likes of
Rockefeller, Strong, James Baker and Edmund de Rothschild himself, the
conference ultimately revolved around the question of financing for the
burgeoning environmental movement that Strong had shaped from the ground
up through his work at the United Nations Environment Program.
It was at that conference (recordings of which are available online,
thanks to whistleblower George Hunt) that Rothschild called for a World
Conservation Bank, which he envisioned as the funding mechanism for a
“second Marshall Plan” that would be used for third world “debt relief” and that favourite globalist dog whistle “sustainable development.”
Rothschild’s
dream came true when Strong presided over another high-level UN
environment summit: the 1992 Rio “Earth Summit.” Although perhaps best
known as the conference that birthed Agenda 21, much less well known is that it was the Earth Summit that allowed the World Conservation Bank to become a reality.
Do
read all that James Corbett has to say on the matter. But I now want
to shift to the WEF and its website, where its current plans are laid
out.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/my-carbon-an-approach-for-inclusive-and-sustainable-cities/
“3. Raised awareness and ownership for nature and environment – In the last few years, there is an increased awareness and public concern on climate change and specially among youth. The UNDP’s “Peoples’ Climate Vote” reflects that over 64% of people believe climate change is a global emergency.
A new Pew Research Center survey in 17 advanced economies found
widespread concern about the personal impact of global climate change: 80% of citizens say they are willing to change how they live and work to combat the effects of climate change. Young adults, who have been at the forefront of some of the most prominent climate change protests
in recent years, are more concerned than their older counterparts about
the personal impact of a warming planet in many public surveys.
* Note the intense concern with what people believe, rather than with what is actually taking place.—Nass
“What next? Sustainable cities enabled through smart communities
The three trends provide strong evidence towards enabling a social movement for “My Carbon” initiatives by enabling public-private partnerships to help curate this program. It is suggested to drive a three-way approach to shape this movement.”
See
the buzzwords (I have bolded them) that don’t mean much? What I think
Klaus is saying, between the lines, is that they have snowed enough
people, especially the youth, to now move forward with rationing,
justifying it with “public-private partnerships” to make the rationing
appear to be a charitable endeavor and not government-imposed reduction
in living standard.
See below for what comes next. Increased costs, induced guilt, and a new definition of your ‘fair share’—Nass
The three trends provide strong evidence towards enabling a social movement for “My Carbon” initiatives for sustainable cities…
Finally,
it is significant that all stakeholders across the value chain come
together and contribute towards achieving a net-zero future by leaving
no one behind.
Who will be today’s Maurice Strong to push the “My Carbon” (we
get to ‘own’ the austerity, it seems) initiatives and the sustainable
cities? I don’t know what stakeholders across the value chain means, nor
a net-zero future. But I do know that in this context, ‘“leaving no
one behind” means corralling every last (powerless) human into a life of
want.
The idea is to insert false beliefs into us and
then use them to peacefully have us give away our possessions. And
then, disarmed by poverty, we will give away, or have taken, the rest of
our rights. If any still exist.
UPDATE: The Sept. 24 WSJ
shows how the system works to enforce the single narrative. The head
of the World Bank, David Malpass, appointed by Trump, apparently failed
to reinforce the climate narrative during a Q and A.
The
World Bank chief has been under criticism since Tuesday over his
response to questions regarding whether burning of fossil fuels has led
to rapid and dangerous global warming. At a New York climate event
hosted by the New York Times he declined to directly answer, saying, “I
am not a scientist.”
Since then, unspecified
climate activists have called for his resignation. White House Press
Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said “Treasury will hold him accountable to
this position.” Malpass has since corrected himself, stated that the
World Bank is taking a forceful leadership position on climate change,
and said he won’t resign.
I'm an Australian. I turned 60 a couple of months ago. Over the course of my lifetime (1962 to present), the climate in Australia has decidedly changed, and not for the better. It has become vastly more unpredictable, and adverse natural events (bush fires, floods, droughts, heat waves, freezes, etc.) — ever a part of Australian life — have become vastly more frequent, extreme, and destructive. It has become increasingly difficult for natural systems, domestic animals, and humans to cope in the short-term and adapt in the long-term.
Roll on, "greening" of the Energy sector! It's exciting to see such wonderful innovations, and I look forward to electricity being cheap and abundant again.
Great article! Most “natural disasters” that are happening are far from natural. There is always an agenda at play. I don’t like to give the wizards behind the curtain too much credit, but manipulating the weather has become one of their specialties!