UPDATED April 9 and 11. The unredacted Fauci-Farrar emails of Feb 1-2, 2020. Ron Fouchier tells us 6 reasons the genome does not look natural, and how to shoot each one down.

Farrar discusses drafting the Nature Medicine article. Garry tells us how to build a SARS-CoV-2.

A much longer and more complete story regarding the Fauci-Farrar call and coverup was published by US Right to Know’s Emily Kopp on April 11 here.

____________________

Start from the bottom of the screenshots as the 8 pages are in reverse chronological order, as emails are. At the bottom I will have a few more remarks about these emails.

Note that Farrar messed up, something very rare for him. Instead of using the word ‘leaked’ in reference to lab origin, he used the word ‘released.’ This is important. Built in to all mainstream discussion of origin today is a possible leak. But in hindsight, given the extensive planning to suppress HCQ; to suppress the use of reasonably accurate tests in the US until mid March or later, enabling the virus to spread through the US without detection; to control dissent and push out a single narrative; it is foolish to dismiss a deliberate planned release of SARS-CoV-2. If this is what was done, the perpetrators would use the lab leak as their fallback cover story. And where better to begin a major release than in a town where a Chinese lab could be blamed?

How innocent Jeremy looks. How could this man plan the poisoning of 2500 hospitalized COVID patients (in order to prevent billions from accessing hydroxychloroquine to treat their SARS-CoV-2 infections), plan the COVID origin coverup, and now be the W.H.O.’s Chief Scientist, helping to effect a world coup?

Farrar also discusses setting up some international body to release a coverup explanation. For the guy who claims he did not know how to buy a burner phone in his book SPIKE, he sure knows how to conduct a clandestine phone call.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23569977-feb-2nd-exchanges

Above, Robert Garry seems to be telling the group how you could make a SARS-2-like virus and that you would probably not use an existing or known strain to start with. He does not seem to think it is that hard. (Note: the Nature Medicine article he coauthored claimed the reverse, that of course scientists would start with a “known backbone.”)

Here Jeremy is setting up the WHO coverup, but apparently Tedros and Bernhard are not keen to participate. [This I learned from a different set of emails.] BTW in case you missed my chagrin when I read that ridiculous Nature Medicine paper in March 2020, my responses are here and here. I had some related thoughts here.

Oh yeah, Jeremy Farrar (007, license to overdose) is completely neutral on this. So then why did he organize a coverup article in Nature Medicine, for which he hounded the Nature publisher to print, and which he edited, though his name is not on the paper? And Andrew Rambaut is agnostic too, yet he is an author of the coverup article that says no way this was from a lab.

This long Fouchier email was redacted in its entirely in mid 2021 when the first set of these emails surfaced. No wonder, because this is a detailed explication of the coverup arguments they will use to push the “spillover” theory.

This second email, right after the call, mentions drafting the Nature Medicine coverup article.

Note that some recipient names in the email just above are completely redacted, while others only have their email addresses redacted. What was special about the fully redacted names? Do we know who they are? I think I saw other names in an earlier batch. This happens when different FOIA officers are doing redacting at different times, because the emails can be obtained (separately) from any of the individual recipients that works for a government.

It is very important to acknowledge that on Feb 1, 2020 this group knew a huge amount about the genome of SARS-2, even though much of this information was withheld from the public.

At the same time, these conspirators were happy to plan a coverup or two for a pandemic that would affect billions.

Actually I know of 5 coverups if you add in the Francis Collins blog post, the Daszak-authored Lancet Correspondence and the National Academy of Sciences letter to the White House that Daszak drafted.

The emailed remarks by Farrar and Francis Collins reveal they were couching their remarks in neutral language but allowing the underlying messages to get through.

They knew email was not secure but still, it seems, even for 007 there was no way besides phone calls to fully hide their intentions.

Somewhere I read that an attempt was made to place the Proximal Origins article into the journal Nature, but Nature would not take it, and then Jeremy had to step in to get it into Nature Medicine, a less prestigious journal. Did the Wellcome Trust that Jeremy Farrar directed pay the journal to take it? Was there some other quid pro quo? Because if you read my March-April critiques of the paper (linked above), the arguments in it made no sense, and I wonder even today how it got through peer review. Shouldn’t the authors be charged with scientific misconduct for knowingly publishing a false interpretation of cherry-picked data, for which the penalty is a ban on receiving NIH grants for a number of years?

If there is a complaint against them, their institutions and NIH would be forced to perform investigations, and the public might then learn more about how this coverup was managed and maintained.

Allegations of violations of research integrity are skyrocketing.

Please add anything I may have missed.

Here is a recent memorandum from the House Select Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Majority Staff dated March 5, 2023 titled “New Evidence Resulting from the Select Subcommittee’s Investigation into the Origins of COVID-19 – “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”’

Here is a NYT Op-Ed of March 28, 2023 pointing out the early Fauci and Daszak lies about whether they thought that COVID might have a lab origin.