The Associated Press, incensed that a tweet of me speaking about the WHO and the “soft coup” we are undergoing got more than 5 million views, writes a HIT Piece on me
The author is Melissa Goldin, who specializes in the “fact check” genre
Now
let’s examine her clarity, comprehensiveness and accuracy. Her talent
for document analysis seems to fall short of actually reading the
documents. By the way, someone should teach her arithmetic. If she
went to work for the AP in July 2022, she has only worked for them 1
year and 1 month to 1 year and 2 months.
Oh, she works in
partnership with social media companies. I thought that was a clear
conflict of interest for journalists. But that would be elevating her
genre to journalism, which I am not sure it is. So let’s see what she
wrote and how it comports with reality.
https://apnews.com/article/ap-fact-check-873009990520
Straw Man #1:
I am not a WHO representative. Who said I was? Not me, not anyone
else I know. I have not seen a single edit that makes it appear I am
speaking for the WHO. Why was her story titled like that? Why am I am
“woman” and not a “Dr.” or “Speaker”?
https://apnews.com/article/ap-fact-check-873009990520
Not only is the title misleading, her claim, the first line in her piece, is a double fabrication.
Is she a journalist or a fiction writer? I told her the slides I
showed had the references—the slide provided the current version of the
proposed WHO amendments that removed human rights. She does not like
doing her homework, it seems.
AP’s assessment is that I don’t work for the WHO. Duh! I was not speaking for the WHO. Double Duh!
The
conference at which I spoke, in the European Parliament, included about
40 speakers. She claims some—all—who? are “known for spreading
COVID-19 misinformation. Which ones? Our fabricator avoids any
specifics. The conference was the International COVID Summit. Fake
news journo Goldin says my ”credentials are not mentioned” when they
were on the slides and I referred to myself as Dr. Meryl Nass at the
start of the talk. Hello? The program had them as well.
“Alleged
evidence”—I claimed “a WHO Treaty is part of this plan.” Which part is
merely alleged? There is a WHO Treaty for Pandemic Preparedness I
spoke of. Here is the latest draft, which surfaced a month after
I gave this talk in early May (after I called attention to the removal
of human rights language) suddenly adding back the human rights that had
been removed from the draft WHO Amendments. When
I gave this talk all drafts of the treaty and IHR amendments had
removed human rights protections. Check them out, Melissa. Oh, I
forgot. You don’t read treaties.
Another
trick Melissa used is to downgrade the popularity of the tweets that
include some or all of my 5 minute speech. The “WTF am I hearing” tweet
had over 1.5 million views several days ago, and a 2:48 sec tweet had
over 2.7 million views on Aug 1 when I took the screen shot below. BTW
that blue name tag I was wearing provided full identification for both
me and the venue.
Melissa: yes, my license was initially suspended for spreading misinformation. But I was not TRIED
for spreading misinformation, because the Maine Medical Board, unlike
you, understood we had a First Amendment and was not willing to litigate
against it. So all misinformation charges were dropped before my hearing started.
It
is so sad that so-called journalists are the ones trying to destroy
freedom of speech and of the press. Think about it, Melissa. ChatGPT
can already do what you do: pose as a journalist. Your brand of
fantasy isn’t going to last long—due to a unique political climate you
obtained a few short years to spread your venom. Then what will you do?
Chambermaid? Take stock. Develop self-respect. Get an honest job.
Not
only has the treaty not been ratified, it does not yet exist in final
form. It has not been voted on. Once it passes, all countries that
voted for it will be obliged to follow its dictates. It will take at
least 3 years, once a nation is a party to the treaty for it to get out
from under the treaty’s provisions. In its current form, the treaty
does not require a declaration of a pandemic; it will be in force
continuously. Unlike Melissa’s fabrications (she told me she was not
going to read the treaty draft and her “fact-check” displays her gross
lack of knowledge) there is an enforcement mechanism: nations are
required to establish a “focal point” to enforce the provisions and
report back to the WHO. In addition, a Conference of the Parties and
another WHO Bureau are to be formed, which may add additional
enforcement mechanisms. The treaty definitely will overrule national
policies, regardless of what her AP has reported—at least in its current
draft it will. Here’s how:
BTW
I never said the WHO itself was planning a coup. I did not say who the
planners were, but I explained how WHO draft documents and policies fit
into the overall framework.
I’m soooo relieved that the WHO press office confirmed to Melissa they were not plotting a coup!
Here
is my earlier substack with the entire International COVID Summit video
and the complete set of my slides used in the presentation:
Here are versions of the tweet (there are dozens, none of which I created) that so incensed the AP reporter:
English
https://twitter.com/wideawake_media/status/1696493535988437085
French
https://twitter.com/LDeclencheur/status/1695837105971208485
The tik tok “Bro” version
https://twitter.com/vegastarr/status/1695701140216647825
Full
disclosure: ANYONE WHO TANGLES WITH ME WILL GET A VOLLEY OF TRUTH
BOMBS BACK. Your fake news will blow up in your face. My Sun, Moon and
Mars are in Aries, which astrologically makes me a super warrior. I
welcome debate and challenge.
Associated Press: Next time, please send your A team.