2 interviews with Laura Lynn Tyler and Kevin Barrett yesterday.

Mostly about the WHO, but also my case and a few other things. I also spoke at the Brownstone Institute monthly dinner Wednesday night

Both Laura and Kevin were great, up on the subjects and very enjoyable to be with.

Here is a Rumble site for Laura Lynn’ video interview:

https://rumble.com/v3hz7sw-dr.-meryl-nass-and-biological-warfare.html

Kevin has a substack where you can read about our talk as well as listen:

Kevin also wrote last week to the young AP reporter who set up several straw men in order to frame a hit piece on me. Here’s what he told her:

More recently, Dr. Nass was subjected to a discombobulated “debunking” by the Associated Press. “Fact checker” Melissa Goldin spends most of the article belaboring the obvious fact that Dr. Nass is not a representative of the WHO, when in fact neither Dr. Nass nor anyone else has ever claimed that she is! Compounding the irony, Goldin gets the most important fact wrong. I fact-checked her fact-check in a September 2 email:

Hello Melissa,

In your article on the Meryl Nass video, you cite the AP as saying “The (WHO) treaty, though legally binding, has no enforcement mechanisms and does not overrule any nations’ individual health or domestic policies.” But doesn’t the treaty itself say that signatory nations MUST enforce its provisions? Since treaties are legally binding, that means that the treaty DOES include an enforcement mechanism: Namely, the legal requirement that signatory nations enforce it. Therefore it DOES overrule whatever policies those nations would have otherwise pursued by making independent policies illegal, and forcing the signatory nation to enforce the WHO’s rules whether they like it or not.

Please let me know if I’m wrong, in which case I’ll have my international law professor friends arbitrate.

Best

Kevin Barrett

[NO RESPONSE]