Jeffrey Sachs points the finger at Ralph Baric and says we need global oversight of bio research. Problem is, Sachs wanted Tedros to oversee it while creating/sharing a pandemic pathogen library.

That is the part Sachs leaves out. He is too clever by half, that man.

Here is where Sachs just said in 2025 he thinks SARS-CoV-2 came from the University of North Carolina, working in conjunction with the US government. This is certainly where the evidence leads, as well as the fact that so much of Baric’s work has remained hidden. I agree.

https://x.com/ivan_8848/status/1941528944425242853

Then right after that, he says we need “global governance” to solve the problem. Because if the US government was in on it, you need global governance, right? WRONG. At least we have some oversight over our own government. We have NONE over the WHO.

Below is where Professor Sachs tells us to leave it to the WHO to manage dangerous GOF research, in September 2022. Start at minute 20:00 and listen to 23:20. Or read my transcription below. Sachs is a dyed in the wool globalist who says interesting things from time to time, but he says them in aid of global governance. And he wants us to pay for his schemes.

Globalist extraordinaire Jeffrey Sachs read the following on September 15, 2022, regarding the conclusion of the Lancet COVID committee report:

“We don’t want laboratory-created pandemics, and yet there is a lot of hidden, dangerous research underway and it needs to be regulated and supervised.

I am sorry to put even more burden on our dear director general of WHO. But we need WHO to oversee the biosafety. Because we don’t have any global oversight of biosafety right now. And I can tell you surely, whatever the origin of this virus, there is a lot of hidden, dangerous work underway that is not properly controlled, and we need to know what’s happening, to monitor it, and make sure it is being safely and properly done. And that is not the case right now.

Then we recommend several steps for strengthening WHO. WHO is the cornerstone of our global health and safety.

It was made for a reason in 1948. It has done round the clock very difficult work. Including in the most recent hours, as I’ve been hearing, in this.

We need WHO to have a full, proper, adequate budget. We need it to have the backing of political leaders and the global scientific community. We need it to have the powers to investigate as necessary. We can’t let it get caught in geopolitical conflict between the US and China or anyone else. It needs strong global backing.

This is the main message of our report. We want an absolutely strong WHO. We have strong leadership but we need to back the strong leadership.

Finally we need financing. To meet the urgent needs of vulnerable populations. Especially poor people around the world. We live in a world of vast inequality as I have emphasized. But justice is that everybody has the right to life and health. And we’ve also realized that since the Declaration of Human Rights and the Constitution of the WHO itself.

So we call for a global health fund, based in Geneva, working alongside WHO. Of tens of billions of dollars, not a trickle. Roughly 0.1% of the rich world income.

That’s absolutely manageable. So that we have the funding to ensure health systems that function everywhere in the world.”