The letter my local newspapers have refused to print
July 28, 2007A secret medical experiment that injected soldiers with the anti-anthrax vaccine, run over eight years beginning in 1998, raises alarming questions about the army authorities’ conduct. To read the rest of the article, click here.
Half the country has been induced to undergo an illegal procedure (becoming an experimental subject without informed consent) by federal and state governments. The government has knowingly violated the law. The law says that subjects cannot be offered valuable benefits to participate as a research subject, nor can they be coerced. The law says an…
From the NY Times, adapted by Global Security Newswire: … The nation’s preparations for a biological strike face numerous challenges, according to more than 100 interviews with high-level officials at participating federal entities such the National Institutes of Health and the White House, as well as the the Health and Human Services, Defense and Homeland…
Here (or here, if you are having trouble viewing the first set of images) is a side by side comparison of the Sandia pictures (from Anonymous) with pictures of 2 different batches of anthrax spores from another paper. One picture shows anthrax spores WITH an intact exosporium, the other WITHOUT an intact exosporium. Clearly the…
Here is a great idea to help demystify that “seal of approval” we unconsciously apply when we hear the word “vaccine:” De-hypnosis and Calling Things by Their Real Names https://coronawise.substack.com/p/name-that-shot-contest-the-winner?s=w Diane Perlman, PhD 16 hr ago 13 19 What is the most frequently uttered word around the world? Probably “the” but I bet the most…
The WHO has had a set of international health regulations (IHRs) aka a sanitary code to deal with multi-nation infectious disease outbreaks since 1969. In 2005, developed primarily under WHO Director-General Gro Harlen Brundtland, a major update was adopted, which is called the IHRs (2005). We did not know it then, but Brundtland was quite…
Comments are closed.
Great Letter. It should have been printed. They can't print it because they are bought and paid for by the Agenda.
Meryl, that is a well-written letter. Shame on them for not printing it. Thank you. Hang in there. We stand with you.
Wow. Bless you for caring for your patients so well.
When newspapers not that many years ago, those big and small, rushed to cash in on possessing digital online presence, they agreed, also: to allow their own content to be subject to the whims of three rich men.
The owners of Facebook, Twitter and Google.
At the time, during the newspapers big and small gold rush to possess and cash in on online presence, few if any of them, apparently, stopped to consider what has come to pass.
All online media, big and small, be they newspapers, TV, various and sundry blogs, and of course Twitter and Facebook accounts: all of them, now are at the mercy of these three men.
For the small and regional newspapers, even if their publishers actually believe they are "independent"; they are not, in terms of online content.
Yes, their print edition is independent; however, their online content is subject to censorship and being cancelled and de-platformed by the Big 3.
The Dr. Nass letter was rejected precisely because the tiny local papers fear being censored, de-platformed, canceled, online; and losing their FB and Twitter privileges.
Local news autonomy is history; Gone With The Wind.
This is the new normal: conform or be ostracized at best; utterly destroyed at worst.
Local newspapers [and all of them] have lost control of what they can and cannot published; because of the Three Men and the companies they own: FB, Twitter, Google.
It wasn't supposed to be this way.
Meryl—were you aware that Youtube censored Dr McCullough's video initially?
https://aapsonline.org/youtube-censors-top-doctor/?fbclid=IwAR08baaoW6GZqgtDcMes_lqsN02clqpn7-ORaVedyejSAy_z5rj8Dd-8ZUw
And it's this video correct?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxmhvZ6eEI4
And when I want to post this–his testimony before the Senate–on FB–it labels it "partly false" information?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM
Lastly –I am AMAZED they haven't shut you down yet. Thank God.
https://factcheck.afp.com/us-cardiologist-makes-false-claims-about-covid-19-vaccination?fbclid=IwAR2niy-oWy4Ik2VSUgjJU1m98zFeLpR3jKXx30isvpvYp246xVnyUmXwpdU
Your “local” news paper is likely owned by Maine Press 1 AKA Maine Today Media. The news papers in Maine are owned by one family group last I heard. No more local papers.
Hi Dr. Nass,
Please consider submitting something like this to American Thinker in the future.
https://www.americanthinker.com/static/contact_information.html