The Israeli Ministry of Health commissioned a study into vaccine side effects. The researchers came back after 6 months and warned them about medical-legal liability./ Etana Hecht

From Etana’s Substack:

https://etana.substack.com/p/safe-and-effective-wash-rinse-repeat

Finally, at the end of 2021, the MOH quietly released a new system for reporting adverse events
post-vaccination, and simultaneously commissioned Professor Mati
Berkowitz, a leading Israeli expert on pharmacology and toxicology from
Asaf Harofe hospital, to form a team to conduct a study into the adverse
event reporting system for the following 6 months as reports came in.

That
study concluded in May 2022, and the story surrounding the results of
the study itself, the reaction to the results by the MOH, the internal
conversation between the research team and the MOH, and the manner in
which they presented it to the public is deeply concerning. The various
pieces of this story
were researched, put together, and released by Israeli journalist Yaffa
Shir-Raz and Professor Retsef Levi from MIT, an expert in health
systems and risk management and a member of the Israel Public Emergency
Council for the COVID 19 Crisis.

Research Team Presents

In
early June 2022, there was a Zoom meeting conducted between
high-ranking officials at the MOH, and Professor Berkowitz with members
of his team. The meeting was to discuss the results of the study, and
how to move forward. An unknown source leaked a recording of the zoom,
and though it may raise more questions than it answers, the public
deserves to know what was truly found in the report, and how the MOH
manipulated both data and language to present it to the public.

Yaffa and Professor Levi analyzed the report and the Zoom call, and discovered the following disturbing outcomes:

• The report and the findings from the report were withheld from the public by the MOH for 2 months. It was released at the beginning of August.

• As
  mentioned above, the adverse events reports analyzed were collected
  beginning 12 months after vaccination, for 6 months. What the MOH then
  did with the results presented to them by the researchers was calculate
  rates of adverse events using a denominator of TOTAL vaccines
  administered, which is about 18 million. The majority of the population
  got vaccinated with 2 or 3 doses prior to the launch of the reporting
  system, which means the adverse events in the reports are representative
  of a very small portion of injections, yet presented as though it’s a
  comprehensive study of the vaccination campaign.

• Missing
  from the report is the size of the population that was studied. The
  report indicates that this is a report done on the general population,
  but in reality, it only covers ~15% of the Israeli population. There are
  4 main Health Maintenance Organizations, and every Israeli is a member
  of one of them. Only one of those HMOs, called Meuhedet, complied with
  the request to hand over the data collected by the reports. Again, using
  the denominator of all doses given, the MOH didn’t include 85% of
  reports in their equation.

  Example:
  As you can see from the report itself, they refer to 18+ million doses
  administered. The adverse event reports that they studied numbered
  8,000+, and they verified 6259 separate events. This represents the rate
  of adverse events to come from those numbers, however, the 6259 is only
  representing reports that came in beginning ONE YEAR after the launch
  of the vaccination, and of those, it only represents about 15% of the
  reports, from the one health clinic that cooperated and shared their
  data. With that information in mind, 6259 represents a far greater rate
  of adverse events than is presented.

  

• Contrary
  to endlessly repeated claims by Pfizer and the MOH that there aren’t
  serious side effects, and side effects that do occur are short-lasting,
  the report doesn’t reflect that at all. They define “short-term” as
  lasting a few days, but 90% of the reports showed effects lasting up to 3
  months, with 60% of the reports lasting longer than 3 months, some of
  them still ongoing.

• The approval to vaccinate babies
  ages 6 months through 4 years came three weeks AFTER the report was
  submitted to the MOH. The MOH did NOT disclose the findings of the
  report to the committee tasked with approving the vaccine for babies.
  

Zoom Leaks

The video clips that have been leaked from the Zoom meeting are damning.

Part 1- Rechallenge

Professor
Berkowitz can be heard discussing the concept of “rechallenge”. This is
a method that proves causation between 2 events, when the reaction to
an intervention re-occurs or worsens with another dose. It proves that
the reaction was caused by the dose, and was not coincidental. There was
a high rate of dose dependent adverse events, and the study proved
causation. (The video itself has English subtitles)

Part 2- Medical-Legal Liability

In
this clip, Professor Berkowitz discusses the legal liability of the
Ministry of Health. Translated from Hebrew, the quote is:

“Here
we will have to really think medical-legal. Why medical-legal? Because
for quite a few adverse events we said: ‘OK, it exists, and there is a
report, but still get vaccinated’. I mean, we have to think about how to
write it and how to present it correctly. So this will not yield
lawsuits later: ‘Wait, wait, wait, you said everything will pass and you
can get vaccinated. And now look what happened to me. The phenomenon
continues.”

Part 3- How Many Men Suffered Menstrual Irregularities?

If
the above findings weren’t as absurd as they are, I might not believe
this next part. In their infinite wisdom, the MOH thought they could get
away with calculating the denominator of vaccines against the reports
of menstrual irregularities using the total number of adult
injections. Adult. Not women. Adult. This means that men were included
in the equation of how common menstrual irregularities were.

Besides
their brilliance in completely messing up any semblance of a proper
calculation, this video clip from the zoom is a team member explaining
that they proved causality between menstrual irregularities and
vaccination due to re-challenge, and that most of the reports (90%)
reported long lasting irregularities.

Logic
dictates that if they weren’t aware of a connection between menstrual
irregularities and vaccination, then they’re also not aware of if or how
that will affect female fertility. Yet, if we take a look at the
official MOH website, the “safe and effective” narrative is still the
party line, even for pregnant women. The same Professor Mati Berkowitz
who conducted this research report is a signature on this report that states the Covid vaccine is safe for pregnant women.

True Journalism

This
all adds to the mounting pile of evidence, anecdotes, data, and
testimony for the claim that the Covid vaccines are much more harmful
than they were advertised to be.

For a comprehensive conversation about these findings, please watch this interview by Ilana Rachel Daniel at Children’s Health Defense TV.

I’ve
only recently begun to appreciate the role that true journalism plays
on behalf of citizens. Our job as citizens who were wronged by our
governments and medical establishments is to keep looking for the truth
and sharing it widely. One day the work of true journalists like Yaffa
Shir-Raz will hold to account those who far overstepped their boundaries
in our lives.