Senator Grassley asks for Answers on Amerithrax Investigation

On August 7, 2008 Senator Grassley wrote to Attorney General Mukasey and FBI Director Mueller asking them to answer 18 excellent questions about their investigation.

Similar Posts

Narcolepsy and Swine Flu Vaccine: Is this the vaccine we use today?/ BBC

From the BBC:  Link between narcolepsy and flu vaccine investigated  Health officials are investigating a link between narcolepsy and the Pandemrix vaccine in two people who were treated for swine flu. Northern Ireland’s Chief Medical Officer has confirmed to the BBC, that Northern Ireland had become the latest country to report suspected cases of the…

U.S. Health Department *Retracts* Statement on Emergent (anthrax vaccine mfr) getting an Ebola contract/ Bloomberg and WaPo

DHHS tells Bloomberg/WaPo it made a mistake about giving that Ebola drug contract to the anthrax vaccine manufacturer. Crayton HarrisonJul 16, 2015 4:40 pm ET (Source retracts statement cited in July 15 story.) “This release was sent in error as the contract has not been signed by all parties,” the agency said in a separate…

During ACIP’s public hearing yesterday, David Wiseman let them have it. But the members were blind, deaf and awfully dumb. Here is his excellent testimony

David Wiseman, Ph.D.  ACIP Meeting November 2, 2021     Thank you, Chairwoman Lee.  Former FDA medical officer Dr. David Gortler just wrote that FDA Failed In Its Duty To Ensure Vaccine Safety For Children. After criticizing the UK for rushing to approve Pfizer’s vaccine, Dr. Fauci called FDA “the gold standard of regulation.” With extensive medical industry experience,…

Technologies Underlying Weapons of Mass Destruction/Office of Technology Assessment

In 1993 the US Government knew that silicon was used to enhance dispersal of powdered microbial agents and toxins.  OTA produced some very useful research, but the agency no longer exists. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Technologies Underlying Weapons of Mass Destruction, OTA-BP-ISC-115 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, December 1993). CHEMICAL ADDITIVES The…

Making the unacceptable “legal” (in this case, indefinite detention without trial) via Executive Order (but it’s still unconstitutional)/ HuffPo

Bill Quigley (Loyola University Law Professor) and Vince Warren (both associated with the Center for Constitutional Rights) discuss Obama’s newest Executive Order:  one designed to uproot the 5th Amendment’s requirement for due process and the 6th Amendment’s rights of the accused, including the right to a speedy trial.  Here is their report on Huffington Post:…

6 Comments

  2. Dr. Nass,

    I found 2 articles implying that even the CIA had Ames anthrax prior to the 2001 attacks (not sure whether or not it was RMR-1029):

    http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/capitalhillanthraxarmy.html

    http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/ciadeniesanthraxsource.html

    Also, as of December 2001, the FBI was not investigating Dugway Proving Ground, even though that facility did make dry, weaponized anthrax:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/dec/14/anthrax.uk

    I’ve heard that in 2002, FBI director Mueller confirmed that neither Dugway or Battelle Memorial Institute were being investigated, although I haven’t been able to confirm that fact yet.

  3. Some people seem to take Dr. Ivins’ “suicide” as proof of a guilty conscience. But if it were so clear that Dr. Ivins did commit suicide, then why is the Government still searching Fredrick County Public Library computers for evidence of a suicide note? (See Affidavit in support of Search Warrant dated August 07, 2008 at http://www.usdoj.gov/amerithrax/08-496%20affidavit.pdf)

  4. "[T]wo doctors who came over from the Soviet Union and work at the facility [where Dr. Ivins worked] think the FBI's behavior is worse than the KGB." ("Fort Detrick Scientist: Ivins Innocent, FBI Worse Than KGB!" http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:k0QBx_DEnW8J:www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi%3FArtNum%3D3261+ivins+kgb+fbi&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us)

    I would just add this. We don't know whether Dr. Ivins did, or did not, intentionally kill himself. We do know that he was running out of money to keep paying lawyers; and that he had two children in college.

    Suppose, just suppose, Dr. Ivins was actually innocent. Suppose that he had been told by his lawyers and others, that the truth would come out eventually. Suppose even further that he believed in his country, and since he knew he was innocent, he believed with great certainty that the real culprits would ultimately be caught.

    He knew that if things continued as they were going he would be bankrupt in a matter of months, leaving his wife with no money and no home, and his children with no college education. And unlike the situation with Dr. Hatfill, the FBI had been careful not to publicly label him as “a person of interest”. So in his case, there wouldn’t be any rainbow, or any gold at the end.

    Is it a great stretch to imagine Dr. Ivins might have believed his loved ones would be better off without him?

  6. George Washington might be able to come up with another excellent blog post with the information in thse videos.

    Number 8 has to do with The anthrax Vaccine. I strongly recommend all videos be watched entirely.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8df9-oADP_c
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrwTciHIpEQ
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGsIenVqSDU
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_rXmKEPeLo
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiHqGfWytkU
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGUn99XHB30
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qQ4dHKgRjs
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_E5ogvOAWA
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbc0I2KKCk8
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-uJ7v3NvMs
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaeAWanF27g
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l13q4hbe3-A
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tM8gk8C69M
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jf_szoJEP6o
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMGz-hzORUo

Comments are closed.