I posted this NIH website info on Informed Consent on May 18, 2019–equally correct today according to the law, while you are being bullied out of this right
https://medlineplus.gov/ency/patientinstructions/000445.htm
While the legislature has gone mad, fueled by fake news and Pharma largesse, forgotten are our minimum, legal standards that guarantee informed consent and prevent US patients from being forced to comply with vaccinations and other medical procedures.
Interestingly, the NIH has not forgotten we have this right.
You have the right to help decide what medical care is best for you. By law, your health care providers must explain your health condition and treatment choices to you.
Informed consent means:
To obtain your informed consent, your provider may talk with you about the treatment. Then you will read a description of it and sign a form. This is written informed consent.
Or, your provider may explain a treatment to you. They will ask if you agree to have the treatment. Not all medical treatments require written informed consent.
Medical procedures that may require you to give written informed consent include:
When asking for your informed consent, your doctor or other health care provider must explain:
You should have enough information to make a decision about your treatment. Your provider should also make sure you understand the information. One way a provider may do this is by asking you to repeat the information back in your own words.
If you would like more details about your treatment choices, ask your provider where to look. There are many trusted websites and other resources your provider can give you.
You are an important member of your health care team. You should ask questions about anything you do not understand. If you need your provider to explain something in a different way, ask them to do so.
You have the right to refuse treatment if you are able to understand your health condition, your treatment options, and the risks and benefits of each option. Your doctor or other health care provider may tell you they do not think this is the best choice for you. But, your providers should not try to force you to have a treatment you do not want to have.
It is important to be involved in the informed consent process. After all, you are the one who will receive the treatment if you give your consent.
Informed consent is not needed in an emergency when delayed treatment would be dangerous.
Some people are no longer able to make an informed decision, such as someone with advanced Alzheimer disease or someone in a coma. In both cases, the person would not be able to understand information to decide what medical care they want. In these types of situations, the provider would try to obtain informed consent for treatment from a surrogate, or substitute decision-maker.
Even when your provider does not ask for your written consent, you should still be told what tests or treatments are being done and why. For example:
Emanuel EJ. Bioethics in the practice of medicine. In: Goldman L, Schafer AI, eds. Goldman-Cecil Medicine. 25th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2016:chap 2.
United States Department of Health and Human Services website. Informed consent. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/informed-consent/index.html. Accessed January 2, 2018.
Legal experts around the World are agreeing that employers would be liable under the international Nuremberg Laws and Helsinki Code of Human Rights. Ignorance of the law is no excuse and to say “I was only obeying orders” is no excuse in the eyes of the law. Those experiencing coercion to be jabbed can find their legal rights listed out at: ‘Informed Consent Campaign — Know Your Rights When Pressured By The Authorities’ https://informed-consent-campaign.10web.me/
Even if you’re not in this position yourself, do please bookmark this site and share it with others.
Also worth watching imho is an interview with Anna De Buisseret – a retired British army officer and a senior employment lawyer. Although she speaks from a UK perspective as to what action employees can take there are similar employment laws in other countries.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQtkNb03lfs
'Vaccine victory in Florida…'
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/vaccine-victory-in-florida/
What's the "most" about in "most vaccines"?
on this note – The FDA's documentation response to the phmpt.org FOIA request for Pfizer data had been quietly distributed a couple weeks ago. They're still gating but did release Pfizer's initial post-authorization adverse events summary report. Pfizer acknowledges a very high rate of incidents.
See: 'Post marketing experience' for tables and graphs & here's a good walkthrough – he's into the data @ 13:00