Similar Posts
Covid-19 clinical trials and Hydroxychloroquine clinical trials
It turns out that hydroxychloroquine has been tested in a couple of hundred clinical trials–BEFORE Covid-19 appeared–for an extraordinarily wide range of medical conditions. Just to give you a feel for the range of illnesses the drug was tried on (I stopped making a list when I got to 30), they include obesity, the prevention of…
Judge says no to inquest on weapons inspector Dr Kelly/ Mail
And the judge adds insult to injury by asking retired surgeon Halpin to pay Attorney General Grieve’s legal costs. The Mail provides the details: A retired surgeon lost a major court battle yesterday in his campaign to secure a proper coroner’s inquest into the death of weapons inspector Dr David Kelly. Dr David Halpin was…
WP Editorial: The Next Attorney General (and the anthrax letters)
Editorial from the Washington Post: …The new attorney general also should ensure that an independent commission or the inspector general review the anthrax investigation. In the summer, the FBI identified Fort Detrick scientist Bruce E. Ivins as the lone suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks that killed five and sickened many more. Mr. Ivins took…
Shining some light on the natural origin theory of SARS-CoV-2
I am going out on a limb here, since genetics has evolved quite a bit in the decades since I studied it. I would appreciate readers to comment on arguments pro and con the natural evolution theory of SARS-CoV-2. While SARS-Cov-2 might have evolved naturally, from bats, pangolins and civets, I have trouble seeing that…
Doctors can use religious or philosophical exemptions for themselves, but patients should only be allowed medical exemptions to vaccination/ American Medical Association
It is truly amazing to witness the hypocrisy of the largest physician guild in the US. Doctors have a Code of Medical Ethics that recommends vaccination in dire circumstances, but allows themselves to use philosophical or religious exemptions–and only “absent” an exemption must doctors be vaccinated. Yet the AMA House of Delegates passed a measure…
National Academy of Science forms committee to review the science of FBI’s anthrax investigation
The National Academies today announced its committee membership to review the FBI’s scientific analysis of anthrax. In an unusual move, the NAS has issued a 20 day comment period in which the public may dispute proposed committee members on the basis of bias. Why was the NAS committee formed? The first mention of such a…
2 Comments
Comments are closed.
It is interesting that the vaccine they approved yesterday for children (ages 5 to 11 years old) has never been used in a clinical trial. The version that was used in clinical trial required extremely cold storage refrigeration. This new non refrigeration version of the vaccine does not require that refrigeration and it's never been validated in a clinical trial. Who in their right mind, does science this way. Correct me if I am wrong, I am aware that manufacturers of vaccines on the infant schedule do not have any liability for death or injuries that their vaccine cause. And I believe there is similar waiver of liability for EUA / Emergency Use Authorization vaccines under some other act (Prep At?).
However, in both situations aren't the manufactures liable for damages if their products cause damages due to a manufacturing error?? Said another way, manufacturers always have to make a product correctly.
Do you see where I am going with this?
The manufacturing requirements that need to be met are established by the original validated product that was used in the initial clinical trial – aka the extreme refrigeration clinical trial. To jab a patient with a non refrigerated product that does not meet the manufacturing requirements of the initial product is to jab them with a product that was fundamentally not made correctly. Thus the manufacturer is liable for any injury resulting from the non refrigerated vaccine injected into a child.
My favorite phrase from this:
"protect the public from the harmful acts of health professionals"
Not something you expect to read, and agree with.