Outstanding Questions

See September 6 version above

Similar Posts

Tower of Babel as Reporters Try to Decipher Bioethics Commission Report

Reading 26 media reports describing the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues’ report on testing anthrax vaccine and other countermeasures in children, one learns very little: This was a really hard job for the Commission.  They had to get it precisely right.  The safety of kids is our most important priority.   The…

Pfizer’s Chief Financial Officer tells investors it is “becoming increasingly likely that an annual revaccination is going to take place”

Read it yourself.  Thank Lee Fang at The Intercept for providing this transcript of Pfizer’s recent phone call with investors.  The quote I used in the title is from page 4: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20514141-pfe-usq_transcript_2021-03-11  In case you haven’t figured it out, the worse current vaccines do against viral variants, the more frequently new vaccines can be sold…

The Great Reset for Dummies/ Tessa Lena’s Substack

 https://tessa.substack.com/p/great-reset-dummies The peasants are getting fat, and they are breeding!Oh no. What is “the Great Reset”? The Great Reset is a massively funded, desperately ambitious, internationally coordinated project led by some of the biggest multinational corporations and financial players on the planet and carried out by cooperating state bodies and NGOs. Its soul is a combination of early 20th century…

Masking and Microns

Graphic only from https://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/what-makes-an-effective-diy-mask Coronavirus: 0.1μm (the speck on the far left) Pore size of N95: 0.1 -0.3 μm (0.1-0.3 microns) Pore size of standard surgical mask: 0.3-10 μm I like this graphic.  For a mask to work, it needs to filter out particles.  This requires that the pore size of the mask be smaller than the…

UK Pathologist Clare Craig explains the fraud in the Pfizer trial that led to authorization for babies in 2 minutes. 97% of COVID cases were written off.

 https://twitter.com/hartgroup_org/status/1537458392414969856 Here someone has juxtaposed Dr. Craig’s discussion with the lies coming from the mouth of Rochelle Walensky, who makes no pretense of accuracy, honesty, or second thoughts regarding her admonishments to poison your children. https://rumble.com/v197mj7-eua-amendment-request-for-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-for-children.html  And here is Governor DeSantis saying that Florida thinks the risks outweigh any potential benefits and it won’t be…

Vaccine Is On Its Way, But Public Still Wary. Swine Flu Campaign Faces Key Barriers: Unease, Ambivalence

Excerpts from the Washington Post: As the federal government launches the most ambitious inoculation campaign in U.S. history, several surveys indicate the public is decidedly ambivalent. “Safety is our top priority,” said Anne Schuchat, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “What I want people to know is that no corners…

6 Comments

  1. Again with the hoax letters? The FBI has never said a word about any hoax letters being linked to the case. Why would the anthrax attacker(s) need to send hoax letters, anyway? Plenty of other people were already doing that, especially after the attacks. One more would be lost in the noise.

  2. Good questions. Some more.

    Were swabs for anthrax found in Ivins home, car, etc. that didn’t match those in the letters? Do other anthrax researchers have 100 percent no spore home and car environments?

    http://www.amconmag.com/article/2008/aug/25/00012/

    ” They swabbed his residence, locker, several cars, the tools in his laboratory, and his office space, but found no trace of anthrax that genetically matched the bacteria in the letters.”

    If they found anthrax that didn’t match in his home, car, etc. but didn’t find anthrax that did, it would tend towards making it unlikely Ivins was the mailer.

  3. There were such hoax letters before 9/11, they were after too. This undermines the “Ivins is a letter writer” proof of guilt because anthrax threats by mail were common. Remember how Hatfill’s commission of a study about anthrax via mail was supposedly evidence of guilt according to prior FBI delusions? (If Ivins was mentally ill, what about the FBI agents who wrote that Greendale School/Sorority/NBC scenario?)

    The block handwriting is either 1. made so to disguise the author’s natural handwriting, a not untypical criminal conduct or 2. The writing of a person whose first language did not use Latin letters. Say, Arabic or Urdu. Discounting foreign possibilities was economically-correct safety-mongering by the government.

    It is possible the FBI floated the London letter story. More likely it was Ms. ______ and her chattering friends who made it up while hunting the Great White Whale, I mean, the Angry White Male Perpetrator. Early versions of her “research” inadvertantly left the word “Hatfill” on her web publications.

  4. My outstanding question is, when will the forensic evidence or even, the scientific evidence be evaluated in a forum un-mediated by the Bush administration?

  5. Elizabeth, I heard McCain will put Sarah in charge of that post haste as soon as he’s sworn in.

  6. What many fail to realize is that some letters were sent out earlier in the year that implied the destruction of the something as well as explaining that the person reading the letter would not be alive to see it.

    Also within this letter was a medallion for the recipient to pray with.

    The person that received this one letter thought it was an idle threat and cleaned the area using universal precautions and threw the letter and other items away.

Comments are closed.