The letter my local newspapers have refused to print

 


Similar Posts

WHO: Radiofrequency radiation from cell phones and other sources a possible carcinogen

From the Washington Post: “After a weeklong meeting on the type of electromagnetic radiation found in cellphones, microwaves and radar, the expert panel said there was limited evidence cellphone use was linked to two types of brain tumors and inadequate evidence to draw conclusions for other cancers.” This whole issue is totally gummed up by…

Effect Magnitude

Everybody knows some things are good for health and some things are bad.  Yet one rarely learns the magnitude of the positive or negative effect, making it impossible to take the logical approach, which is to balance risks and benefits as we make all sorts of choices. For example, how much benefit will I receive…

Nevada Democrats pick ‘None of these candidates’ for governor in Primary/ WaPo

In light of the Eric Cantor defeat in Virginia’s Republican primary, that fact that more Nevada voters cast votes for a “None of the Above” option than for a candidate is interesting.  Voters are fed up in both the east and west.  From the Washington Post blog: “And the winner is — no one. More…

Preparing a Medical Response to Bioterrorism/ Nass, Nov 2001

(I was asked to post this–Meryl) Invited submission to the Committee on Government Reform for its November 14, 2001 Hearing: Comprehensive Medical Care for Bioterrorism Exposure Preparing a Medical Response to Bioterrorism  — A broad view of the problem — Seeking affordable protection — Identifying research needs — How much protection is obtainable? Preparing a…

Anthrax Redux: Did the Feds Nab the Wrong Guy?/ Wired

Noah Schactman has an extremely detailed, useful piece on the anthrax mailings in Wired.  Noah did his homework.  The 72 comments are also interesting. UPDATE:  Podcast with Noah here.  Extracts of the magazine story follow: In February 2003, anthrax became part of the rationale for invading Iraq. Colin Powell went to the United Nations Security…

8 Comments

  1. Great Letter. It should have been printed. They can't print it because they are bought and paid for by the Agenda.

  2. Meryl, that is a well-written letter. Shame on them for not printing it. Thank you. Hang in there. We stand with you.

  4. When newspapers not that many years ago, those big and small, rushed to cash in on possessing digital online presence, they agreed, also: to allow their own content to be subject to the whims of three rich men.

    The owners of Facebook, Twitter and Google.

    At the time, during the newspapers big and small gold rush to possess and cash in on online presence, few if any of them, apparently, stopped to consider what has come to pass.

    All online media, big and small, be they newspapers, TV, various and sundry blogs, and of course Twitter and Facebook accounts: all of them, now are at the mercy of these three men.

    For the small and regional newspapers, even if their publishers actually believe they are "independent"; they are not, in terms of online content.

    Yes, their print edition is independent; however, their online content is subject to censorship and being cancelled and de-platformed by the Big 3.

    The Dr. Nass letter was rejected precisely because the tiny local papers fear being censored, de-platformed, canceled, online; and losing their FB and Twitter privileges.

    Local news autonomy is history; Gone With The Wind.

    This is the new normal: conform or be ostracized at best; utterly destroyed at worst.

    Local newspapers [and all of them] have lost control of what they can and cannot published; because of the Three Men and the companies they own: FB, Twitter, Google.

    It wasn't supposed to be this way.

  5. Meryl—were you aware that Youtube censored Dr McCullough's video initially?
    https://aapsonline.org/youtube-censors-top-doctor/?fbclid=IwAR08baaoW6GZqgtDcMes_lqsN02clqpn7-ORaVedyejSAy_z5rj8Dd-8ZUw

    And it's this video correct?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxmhvZ6eEI4

    And when I want to post this–his testimony before the Senate–on FB–it labels it "partly false" information?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM

    Lastly –I am AMAZED they haven't shut you down yet. Thank God.

  7. Your “local” news paper is likely owned by Maine Press 1 AKA Maine Today Media. The news papers in Maine are owned by one family group last I heard. No more local papers.

Comments are closed.