Similar Posts
NHS-slashes-services-meet-costs-swine-flu-scare/ Daily Mail
From the Mail Online: The NHS is being forced to cut services because of the huge costs of the swine flu scare that proved unfounded. A survey has found that as many as one in six health trusts may have to slash services – or already have done so – to recoup costs. The cuts…
Useless FDA and CDC admit Covid antibody tests are worthless. Why have they approved them? Why are we paying for them?
I have been meaning to update the information on Covid-19 testing, since it has been such a confusing subject. This post will only cover antibody (aka serology) tests. And most of the post will be direct quotes from the FDA and CDC websites, because you would probably not believe me if I simply paraphrased the…
Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychological operations Complaints about the U.S. military’s influence operations using Facebook and Twitter have raised concern in the White House and federal agencies./WaPo
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/19/pentagon-psychological-operations-facebook-twitter/ The Pentagon has ordered a sweeping audit of how it conducts clandestine information warfare after major social media companies identified and took offline fake accounts suspected of being run by the U.S. military in violation of the platforms’ rules. Colin Kahl, the undersecretary of defense for policy, last week instructed the military commands that…
CDC’s flu stats for this week/ CDC
From CDC’s Fluview:
Adverse events following flu vaccination in Australia/ BMJ
Data suggest that children may have been hospitalized for post-swine flu vaccination seizures at a rate 2-6 times greater than their rate of hospitalization for swine flu disease. Data are lacking on other post-vaccination side effects that might also occur. I suggest you read this short BMJ piece by authors Peter Collignan, Peter Doshi and…
Their intention is to keep you confused and off-kilter. This is not NEWS.
Reuters, Dec. 11: Boosters significantly restore protection vs Omicron, UK says Reuters, Dec. 22: ‘Significant increase’ in protection vs Omicron from mRNA boosters, study says NYT, Dec. 23 Booster protection wanes against symptomatic Omicron infections, British data suggests. The only thing you can come away with, from these headlines, is that at least one of…
2 Comments
Comments are closed.
It is interesting that the vaccine they approved yesterday for children (ages 5 to 11 years old) has never been used in a clinical trial. The version that was used in clinical trial required extremely cold storage refrigeration. This new non refrigeration version of the vaccine does not require that refrigeration and it's never been validated in a clinical trial. Who in their right mind, does science this way. Correct me if I am wrong, I am aware that manufacturers of vaccines on the infant schedule do not have any liability for death or injuries that their vaccine cause. And I believe there is similar waiver of liability for EUA / Emergency Use Authorization vaccines under some other act (Prep At?).
However, in both situations aren't the manufactures liable for damages if their products cause damages due to a manufacturing error?? Said another way, manufacturers always have to make a product correctly.
Do you see where I am going with this?
The manufacturing requirements that need to be met are established by the original validated product that was used in the initial clinical trial – aka the extreme refrigeration clinical trial. To jab a patient with a non refrigerated product that does not meet the manufacturing requirements of the initial product is to jab them with a product that was fundamentally not made correctly. Thus the manufacturer is liable for any injury resulting from the non refrigerated vaccine injected into a child.
My favorite phrase from this:
"protect the public from the harmful acts of health professionals"
Not something you expect to read, and agree with.