Similar Posts
9 x increase in seizures after swine flu vaccine: Australian gov’t investigation
INVESTIGATOR: Australian Nobel Prize winner Professor Peter Doherty is leading an investigation into Australia’s baffling spike in severe side-effects from flu jabs. From Perth Now: SEASONAL flu shots can trigger febrile fits in young children at nine times the expected rate and should not be given to healthy under-fives this winter, the Chief Medical Officer…
Commission members and experts discussion a pedi anthrax trial
Interesting comments were made at the last meeting of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, reported on the Commission blog. They include the following: Anita Allen, J.D., Ph.D., Commission member and Henry R. Silverman Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania: “Military families are subject to extraordinary pressures on the need…
Anthrax Vaccine Lawsuit Dismissed: What Does That Mean?
Federal Judge Collyer last week dismissed a lawsuit challenging Biothrax’s license on the basis that efficacy has not been demonstrated. The suit contended that anthrax vaccine had never been approved for its current intended use, inhalation anthrax. The judge ruled that FDA is, in essence, the arbiter of the science and can interpret the data…
Israel and Pfizer just discovered facial nerve (Bell’s) palsy is a side effect of Pfizer’s shot/ We knew it December 17
Israel National News reports below that new side effects are discovered when you vaccinate 2.5 million people at once with an experimental vaccine. Funny, even before one Israeli was vaccinated it was reported in this blog on December 17 that the mRNA vaccines caused Bell’s Palsy. Don’t you think Pfizer and Moderna knew it too? What…
ICAN explains the law with respect to the EEOC and Covid vaccine mandates: No they can not be required
https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/the-eeoc-did-not-say-federal-law-permits-requiring-a-covid-19-vaccine/
Frontiers in Pharmacology rejected Ivermectin paper after accepting it, then publishes nonsensical paper on hydroxychloroquine
This looks like an HCQ paper that was written a year ago, then sloppily updated. While the authors are from India, they had international editors, including one from Harvard. The penultimate paragraph says HCQ works for Covid, and the final Conclusions paragraph says it doesn’t work. Interestingly, this journal is the same one that accepted…
2 Comments
Comments are closed.
It is interesting that the vaccine they approved yesterday for children (ages 5 to 11 years old) has never been used in a clinical trial. The version that was used in clinical trial required extremely cold storage refrigeration. This new non refrigeration version of the vaccine does not require that refrigeration and it's never been validated in a clinical trial. Who in their right mind, does science this way. Correct me if I am wrong, I am aware that manufacturers of vaccines on the infant schedule do not have any liability for death or injuries that their vaccine cause. And I believe there is similar waiver of liability for EUA / Emergency Use Authorization vaccines under some other act (Prep At?).
However, in both situations aren't the manufactures liable for damages if their products cause damages due to a manufacturing error?? Said another way, manufacturers always have to make a product correctly.
Do you see where I am going with this?
The manufacturing requirements that need to be met are established by the original validated product that was used in the initial clinical trial – aka the extreme refrigeration clinical trial. To jab a patient with a non refrigerated product that does not meet the manufacturing requirements of the initial product is to jab them with a product that was fundamentally not made correctly. Thus the manufacturer is liable for any injury resulting from the non refrigerated vaccine injected into a child.
My favorite phrase from this:
"protect the public from the harmful acts of health professionals"
Not something you expect to read, and agree with.