Similar Posts
Here is how you do the Big Lie/ CNBC and the 99.5% of deaths in the unvaccinated
First CNBC set up the story. It provided facts that actually don’t mean very much. but sound frightening. It said the virus is 1,000 times more transmissible than the original. In fact, precisely this strategy was used in the early days of Covid. The variant is highly contagious, largely because people infected with the…
CDC Director Calls for another COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW of lab safety six months after the last one
UPDATE: 575 shipments, 192 total labs received live, incompletely irradiated Dugway anthrax. Congressional hearing held 7/28/15. (The subjects in my Cheer! below are among those mentioned by USAT on July 21, 2015–Nass) The CDC Cheer When anthrax spores are flying through its halls, whaddaya do? You know what to do: It’s a…
“The Afghan War is Unwinnable” –Reps. Obey and Slaughter, in charge of the war funding vote
From the Washington Post: …frustration with the war is so widespread that two lawmakers in charge of shepherding the bill through the House, Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-Wisc.) and Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), who heads the Rules Committee that establishes the procedures for votes on legislation, both said that the war is unwinnable and…
Gouging the US government on anthrax vaccine/ Guardian
From the October 20 Guardian (UK): Military contractors’ epic overcharging The government needs to know the true cost of the products it’s purchasing to avoid getting fleeced by unscrupulous suppliers A soldier being inoculated for anthrax in 2000. The Pentagon has paid the manufacturer of BioThrax $1.3bn, for a vaccine that an independent report calculates…
What DHHS proposes to tell parents about giving anthrax vaccine to their children
In order to meet the requirements of 45 CFR 46.407, a federal advisory panel must review the proposed pediatric research, agree that it will provide important generalizable knowledge, and that children participating in the research will be protected from taking dangerous risks. DHHS has convened the necessary panel, which will meet to discuss details of…
AMA ties itself in knots because its own ethical code disputes its current position in favor of mandatory vaccinations
AMA Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 2.2.1 https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/pediatric-decision-making As the persons best positioned to understand their child’s unique needs and interests, parents (or guardians) are asked to fill the dual responsibility of protecting their children and, at the same time, empowering them and promoting development of children’s capacity to become independent decision makers. In giving…
2 Comments
Comments are closed.
It is interesting that the vaccine they approved yesterday for children (ages 5 to 11 years old) has never been used in a clinical trial. The version that was used in clinical trial required extremely cold storage refrigeration. This new non refrigeration version of the vaccine does not require that refrigeration and it's never been validated in a clinical trial. Who in their right mind, does science this way. Correct me if I am wrong, I am aware that manufacturers of vaccines on the infant schedule do not have any liability for death or injuries that their vaccine cause. And I believe there is similar waiver of liability for EUA / Emergency Use Authorization vaccines under some other act (Prep At?).
However, in both situations aren't the manufactures liable for damages if their products cause damages due to a manufacturing error?? Said another way, manufacturers always have to make a product correctly.
Do you see where I am going with this?
The manufacturing requirements that need to be met are established by the original validated product that was used in the initial clinical trial – aka the extreme refrigeration clinical trial. To jab a patient with a non refrigerated product that does not meet the manufacturing requirements of the initial product is to jab them with a product that was fundamentally not made correctly. Thus the manufacturer is liable for any injury resulting from the non refrigerated vaccine injected into a child.
My favorite phrase from this:
"protect the public from the harmful acts of health professionals"
Not something you expect to read, and agree with.