Similar Posts
Battelle has had an (unused) method to decontaminate N95 masks aka respirators for years!
Unbelievable. 4 years ago, the FDA gave contractor Battelle half a million dollars to study the use of commercial decontamination equipment, using hydrogen peroxide gas, on N95 masks. Battelle said the method worked in 2016. But we are only just hearing about it, as thousands of healthcare workers get infected due, in part, to lack…
The Delta Helter Skelter. When Dire Delta is the excuse for new lockdowns and vaccine mandates, but the truth keeps dribbling out. Today more news from Israel
‘Helter-skelter’ means ‘in chaotic and disorderly haste’. It seems a good descriptor of how public health mouthpieces are dealing with the facts oozing out of the public health muck regarding the Delta variant. Considering that their strategy has been to use Delta to impose ever more harsh and unjustifiable Great Reset measures, their brains must…
Jeffrey Tucker hits it out of the park on the Great Trucker Revolt/ Brownstone Institute
Here is provide just a snippet. Read the whole article please. Canada’s truckers have opened up a path back to freedom. https://brownstone.org/articles/justin-trudeau-ducks-the-great-trucker-revolt/ “… This is not really or just about vaccine mandates. It’s about what they represent: government taking possession of our lives. If they can force you to get an injection in your arm over…
House Judiciary Wants Answers From FBI Chief on Anthrax
CQ TODAY ONLINE NEWS Sept. 5, 2008 By Seth Stern, CQ Staff Members of the House Judiciary Committee made clear Friday they expect more answers from the FBI about its August announcement that a government scientist was responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks on Capitol Hill and elsewhere. Committee members submitted a list of questions…
Deviations from “Good Manufacturing Practices” the rule/ the Australian
An FDA inspection uncovered multiple significant deviations from standard manufacturing processes, termed “good manufacturing practices” at CSL (previously known as Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, and previously an Australian government lab) in its manufacture of flu vaccine for the US market. As is standard in these cases, a disclaimer was made to the effect that there is…
New ACIP recommendations for anthrax vaccine include post-exposure regimen
The CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices posted its new but provisional recommendations for anthrax vaccine on October 5. Post-exposure use is recommended, although this is not an approved indication per FDA. Therefore, the ACIP recommends that anthrax vaccine be administered under an Investigational New Drug (IND) application or an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). The…
2 Comments
Comments are closed.
It is interesting that the vaccine they approved yesterday for children (ages 5 to 11 years old) has never been used in a clinical trial. The version that was used in clinical trial required extremely cold storage refrigeration. This new non refrigeration version of the vaccine does not require that refrigeration and it's never been validated in a clinical trial. Who in their right mind, does science this way. Correct me if I am wrong, I am aware that manufacturers of vaccines on the infant schedule do not have any liability for death or injuries that their vaccine cause. And I believe there is similar waiver of liability for EUA / Emergency Use Authorization vaccines under some other act (Prep At?).
However, in both situations aren't the manufactures liable for damages if their products cause damages due to a manufacturing error?? Said another way, manufacturers always have to make a product correctly.
Do you see where I am going with this?
The manufacturing requirements that need to be met are established by the original validated product that was used in the initial clinical trial – aka the extreme refrigeration clinical trial. To jab a patient with a non refrigerated product that does not meet the manufacturing requirements of the initial product is to jab them with a product that was fundamentally not made correctly. Thus the manufacturer is liable for any injury resulting from the non refrigerated vaccine injected into a child.
My favorite phrase from this:
"protect the public from the harmful acts of health professionals"
Not something you expect to read, and agree with.