Similar Posts
New paper on Covid vaccine safety has stirred up a hornet’s nest of controversy
Update July 2: The paper was retracted by the journal editors. Their justification does not hold water. 2nd update July 2: In an article in today’s Newsweek about the death of a 13 year old just two days after his second Pfizer shot, local health department spokespeople issued a statement that included, “Meanwhile, the health…
I called the CDC to ask about the shots…
The following “conversation” was passed on by a friend. You don’t know whether to laugh or cry. How can this be, and how did we get here? ME: CDC, should I get poked if I already had Covid? CDC: “Yes, you should be poked regardless of whether you already had COVID-19. That’s because experts do…
Flu vaccination campaign a ‘mess’ that should be discontinued: Canadian health official/ National Post
Excerpts from an article in the National Post, detailing remarks by Dr. Richard Schabas, Ontario’s former chief medical officer and a top health officer in the province: “In eastern Ontario where I live and work the outbreak is effectively over. If we’re immunizing people now essentially you’re barring the barn door after the horse is…
White House ready to ship out 15 million child size COVID vaccine doses the week the vaccines are authorized by FDA and blessed by CDC
Kids 5-11 will be receiving their COVID vaccinations in the pediatricians’ offices, from people they trust, according to the White House. Does anyone else think it is fishy how at the beginning of the roll out, you had to go to huge vaccine centers to get your shot, where no one could actually explain things…
Iran Wants War (cartoon)/ Zero Hedge
Finally, putting Iran’s aggression in context:
Would you give anthrax vaccine to a child? DHHS Secretary Sebelius would
I am honored to be on the board of the Alliance for Human Research Protection and to be working with its dynamic President, Vera Sharav, on stopping a dangerous trial of anthrax vaccine in healthy children. Why sacrifice healthy children for this purpose, when the vaccine does not even have a useful role in post-exposure prophylaxis…
3 Comments
Comments are closed.
'List of Ukraine Biolab documents reportedly removed by US Embassy'!
https://sharylattkisson.com/2022/03/list-of-ukraine-biolab-documents-reportedly-removed-by-us-embassy/
BREAKING!
'NOT JUST WUHAN: Document Shows US Military Was Funding Bioresearch on Coronavirus in Insectivorous Bats in Ukraine'.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/not-just-wuhan-document-shows-us-military-funding-bioresearch-coronavirus-insectivorous-bats-ukraine/
I watched it live.
A few take aways:
0] USA and other said the WHO has found no problems and is not aware of any; meaning WHO is the referee, from this perspective.
1] Mexico pointed out [as did China] there is no "multi-lateral" regime in place to fairly and justly: investigate and adjudicate weapons of mass destruction issues, period. [Of which bio weapons secretly via US and military proliferating in Ukraine is latest problem, they said.]
2]Russia said they told UNSC March 7,days before alleged "hospital bombing" in Mariupol that building was evacuated and being used by Ukraine forces; and said a landmine exploded in vicinity of the building, and the building was not blown up, there was no dead and interior in many places untouched.
3] Ukraine said it was bombed and the hospital was destroyed.
4] China: biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine should trigger great concern.
5] US denied everything and refused to engage any substance. And the WHO said nothing to see here according to US.
6] Ireland "deeply regrets" "baseless claims against United States"
7] US repeatedly used word "Disinformation" — China "too has been spreading misinformation" and US said Russia called UNSC meeting for "sole purpose of spreading lies and misinformation"
8]Russia: "there was no international control" of WMDs in Ukraine
9] Mexico: "WHO has no knowledge of anything" viz. "biological weapons" in Ukraine. "There is no external mechanism in place" to verify anything.
10] China: if US believes information is fake, then provide us with relevant data so international community can make determination.
11] Russia: US did not address the substance, indicating a "guilty mind. . . we hit the nail on the head when we were talking about nefarious activity"
The UNSC meeting 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., March 11 2022
-30-