Similar Posts
There were several reasons why it was critical for the conspirators to maintain the coverup that Covid came from wildlife. Tidbits and more questions
There is plenty the conspirators still do not want you to know. And their lackies in the media will continue to help them, as I demonstrated in my piece on Ian Birrell earlier. Here are some things that we should not forget as the people who created this mess attempt to control the current narrative. …
I am not an army of one. Everybody needs to refuse to go along with criminal government policies
I have gotten a zillion phone calls in the last 2 days about ivermectin, and I have stopped answering the phone. No one can get their prescriptions filled. People are frustrated, angry and scared. Well, so am I. I am REALLY frustrated, angry and scared. I have warned people since the beginning of 2021 that…
3’d Pin down: South Carolina A.G issues opinion freeing doctors to use ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine off-label (NE and OK were pins #1 and 2)
State AG rules doctors can prescribe ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine Publishes legal opinion as hospitals refuse treatments for COVID-19 By Art MoorePublished February 14, 2022 at 8:08pm Asked to provide a legal opinion on hospitals in the state banning doctors from prescribing certain treatments for COVID-19, South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson concluded doctors have the authority to…
Maine’s vaccine exemption bill supported by “false claims”
Four incorrect (but widely repeated) claims were made by Maine representatives to justify getting rid of religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions. Here I list them and provide documentation to show why they are wrong. 1. “Only 6 states have higher opt-out rates.” “We have one of the worst vaccination rates in the country.” The CDC published vaccination…
UK Pathologist Clare Craig explains the fraud in the Pfizer trial that led to authorization for babies in 2 minutes. 97% of COVID cases were written off.
https://twitter.com/hartgroup_org/status/1537458392414969856 Here someone has juxtaposed Dr. Craig’s discussion with the lies coming from the mouth of Rochelle Walensky, who makes no pretense of accuracy, honesty, or second thoughts regarding her admonishments to poison your children. https://rumble.com/v197mj7-eua-amendment-request-for-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-for-children.html And here is Governor DeSantis saying that Florida thinks the risks outweigh any potential benefits and it won’t be…
The emperor is marching around buck naked/BMJ
The validity and quality of research underpin the entire research enterprise worldwide. However, a number of studies have shown that many researchers take “shortcuts” and that perhaps 1-3% of research is grossly false, fitting into the category of research misconduct. Research misconduct has been defined in US federal law as fabrication, plagiarism and/or falsification. Identified…
One Comment
Comments are closed.
"Covid Vaccines 'Increase Risk of Heart-Related Deaths by Up to 50%', Lancet Analysis of Trial Data Finds!"
A preprint study (not yet peer-reviewed) in the Lancet has analysed the mortality data from the vaccine trials and made the shocking finding that mRNA vaccines had “no effect on overall mortality”. Worse, it found the risk of non-Covid, non-accident mortality actually increased by 17% (relative risk 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-2.05). Furthermore, a full 50% of the non-Covid deaths (27 out of 54) were cardiovascular and the relative risk of such death was 45% higher in the vaccine arm (relative risk 1.45, CI 0.67-3.13), breaking down to 50% higher for Pfizer and 40% higher for Moderna (with wide confidence intervals).
These are clearly alarming findings. But they go oddly unremarked upon in the paper. This is presumably due to the authors being wary of criticising the vaccines in order to be published. If so, it is disappointing that this is thought (probably correctly) to be necessary and indicates how absurdly political vaccine research has become. While the results are not, in this study, statistically significant, in that the confidence intervals are wide and include 1.0, the effect size is large and, in the context of wider concerns about adverse effects of mRNA vaccines on the cardiovascular system, warrant some comment, if only to flag them up and say larger studies are needed to see if statistical significance obtains.
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/