Similar Posts
Jeff Sachs and giving the W.H.O. mo’ money. The Lancet COVID Commission and One Health are important parts of the globalists’ narrative
Meryl Nass 3 hr ago Here is the Lancet COVID Commission Report, chaired by Jeffrey Sachs. Next is an excerpt from its executive summary: “Section 3 presents our policy recommendations, particularly around multilateral cooperation centred at WHO to address global health crises, and around investments in preparedness for future health crises through strong national health…
Swine flu “considerably less lethal” than feared/ BBC
Sir Liam Donaldson, the UK’s chief medical officer, reports the swine flu pandemic is “considerably less lethal” than feared, according to the BBC. A study led by Sir Liam found a death rate of just 0.026% in those infected, the British Medical Journal reported. In the US, approximately 2,000 lab-confirmed deaths have occurred from swine…
Treatments I have found valuable for GWS, anthrax vaccine injuries, chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia, provided to the VA Research Advisory Committee on GW veterans’ illnesses, 2003
Thoughts on treatment of Gulf War Syndrome patients: provided to the Veterans Affairs Research Advisory Committee (RAC) on GWS, February 2003; updated September 2003 Meryl Nass, MD The basic idea of this treatment model is to identify all the patients problems (since this is a multi-symptom and multi-organ syndrome) and address each one. Improving nutrition, healing…
What DHHS proposes to tell parents about giving anthrax vaccine to their children
In order to meet the requirements of 45 CFR 46.407, a federal advisory panel must review the proposed pediatric research, agree that it will provide important generalizable knowledge, and that children participating in the research will be protected from taking dangerous risks. DHHS has convened the necessary panel, which will meet to discuss details of…
Still shameless: Obama’s silver, forked tongue at the UN
No proof has surfaced to assign blame for Syria’s sarin attack of August 21. The US government document that was supposed to lay out the proof was simply a litany of assertions, absent any evidence. Robert Parry discussed the details, or lack thereof. He points out that Bush’s Iraq war ‘dodgy dossier’ had a lot…
Why did FDA tell the COVID vaccine manufacturers to vaccinate all the placebo subjects after only a median of 2 months in the trial? FDA double-crossed the public whose mission it is to protect
From the December 2, 2020 NY Times, excerpts of the discussion about unblinding. Below that, earlier remarks from the BMJ and Dr. Peter Hotez. The NY Times article preceded the FDA advisory committee meeting on authorizing the Pfizer vaccine for adults by 8 days. Even after all this talk, and a multitude of experts asking…
3 Comments
Comments are closed.
'THOUGHTS ON HOW TO FIGHT THEM ON VAX MANDATES'
The Religious Exemption is the incorrect approach.
Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the USC demands that employees are given the "option to accept or refuse administration" of EUA drugs.
Doe #1 v Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (DDC 2003) prohibits the military from requiring experimental drugs.
Griswold v Connecticut (1965) ruled everyone has a Constitutional right to bodily integrity.
US v Stanley (1987) ruled military personnel cannot be forced to take experimental drugs.
Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health (1990) ruled you have the right to refuse medical treatment, even if that treatment would save your life.
Washington v Harper (1990) decided "The forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person's body represents a substantial interference with that person's liberty."
US v Charters (4tth Circuit, 1987) decided "The right to be free of unwanted physical invasions has been recognized as an integral part of the individual's constitutional freedoms."
Religious exemptions will fail because the courts do not view this as a religious issue. There is enough precedent to win on the issue the drugs are EUA only. The only drug approved by the FDA, Comirnaty, is not available in the US. And per a memo to the FDA from Pfizer last month, Comirnaty will not be produced for the US.
Conclusion: there is not a vaccine available in the US that is approved and not under an EUA authorization.
It's just a matter of time before the FDA fraudulently removes the EUA, then what?
Would not the Big Pharma owned FDA have already done that by now if they could?
Not ruling it out in the future?
ABA ASSOC COMMENTS ON US SUPREME COURT/JACOBSON CASE!
A BIG WIN FOR THOSE FIGHTING VACCINE MANDATES!
'THE HIGHWIRE WITH DEL BIGTREE: CENTURY-OLD JACOBSON VS. MASSACHUSETTS RULING AFFECTS VAX MANDATES' [13 min video]
https://thehighwire.com/videos/century-old-ruling-affects-vax-mandates/
PLUS!
'Judge rules in favor of St. Paul unions over COVID Vaccination mandate'!
https://www.twincities.com/2022/06/02/ramsey-county-judge-rules-in-favor-of-st-paul-unions-over-covid-vaccination-mandate/
Plus:!
"Non FDA approved covid vaccines"?
They weren't vaccines: U.S.C. 26 §§4132(a)(2) defines a vaccine as "a substance that prevents one or more diseases".
None of these in their documentation say "prevent" they say "reduces symptoms". Hence, no one is vaccinated. FDA and CDC could be tried for the Medical Fraud for both the shots, PCR tests and masks.
These shots, PCR tests and masks were forced in violation of U.S.C. 21 §'s 360bbb-3 in conjunction with 50.20.
This is the embodiment of the Nuremberg Code in the U.S. Code.
Great Attorney On Fighting Mandates has a lot of INFO, Stats, from DOD, Medicare, and HHS. Etc.
Attorney Tom Renz
https://renz-law.com/