Similar Posts
CHD meeting in Brussels, with speakers Mary Holland, Catherine Austin Fitts, Orsolya Gyorrfy, Wolfgang Wodarg, Sucharit Bhakdi, Michael Palmer and me
https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/eu-issues/watch-the-replay-hands-off-our-children-brussels-belgium-november-12-2022/ My talk lasts 16 minutes, is last, and starts at 3 hrs. 44 minutes.
New York Clinics See Few Crowds for Free Vaccine/ NY Times
Excerpts from this NY Times article: … While the city’s health commissioner, Dr. Thomas A. Farley, said the clinics had the staff and enough vaccine to accommodate about 500 middle- and high-school students per clinic per hour — or as many as 31,500 vaccinations a day — a department spokeswoman put the total vaccinations administered…
Conference of Catholic Bishops advises congregants to avoid the Janssen/ J and J vaccine due to fetal tissue use/WaPo
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/03/02/archdiocese-new-orleans-johnson-vaccine/ On Tuesday, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops urged Catholics to avoid taking the Johnson & Johnson coronavirus vaccine and to choose alternatives from Pfizer or Moderna instead because Johnson & Johnson used cells derived decades ago from an abortion to create the vaccine. The bishops’ recommendation follows a similar one from the Archdiocese of New Orleans last…
Desperately seeking why India is doing so well with Coronavirus, NPR omits its use of HCQ and ivermectin. Instead, “scientists say it’s a mystery”
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/02/01/962821038/the-mystery-of-indias-plummeting-covid-19-cases Last September, India was confirming nearly 100,000 new coronavirus cases a day. It was on track to overtake the United States to become the country with the highest reported COVID-19 caseload in the world. Hospitals were full. The Indian economy nosedived into an unprecedented recession. But four months later, India’s coronavirus numbers have plummeted. Late last month,…
Letter from OMB to Chairs and Ranking Members of House/Senate Intelligence Committees
Here is the letter from OMB detailing the Obama Administration’s objections to the Intelligence Authorization Act passed by the House on February 26, 2010. (Thanks to Steven Aftergood at the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists for posting it, and for his insightful discussion.)
Answers in 2001 anthrax attacks are still elusive/ WaPo editorial
Today the Washington Post called for an independent commission on the anthrax letters: RESOLUTION OF THE 2001 anthrax attacks continues to prove elusive. The Justice Department and the FBI identified Maryland scientist Bruce E. Ivins as having single-handedly carried out the attacks that killed five people and seriously sickened 17 others. The department was on…
3 Comments
Comments are closed.
'THOUGHTS ON HOW TO FIGHT THEM ON VAX MANDATES'
The Religious Exemption is the incorrect approach.
Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the USC demands that employees are given the "option to accept or refuse administration" of EUA drugs.
Doe #1 v Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (DDC 2003) prohibits the military from requiring experimental drugs.
Griswold v Connecticut (1965) ruled everyone has a Constitutional right to bodily integrity.
US v Stanley (1987) ruled military personnel cannot be forced to take experimental drugs.
Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health (1990) ruled you have the right to refuse medical treatment, even if that treatment would save your life.
Washington v Harper (1990) decided "The forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person's body represents a substantial interference with that person's liberty."
US v Charters (4tth Circuit, 1987) decided "The right to be free of unwanted physical invasions has been recognized as an integral part of the individual's constitutional freedoms."
Religious exemptions will fail because the courts do not view this as a religious issue. There is enough precedent to win on the issue the drugs are EUA only. The only drug approved by the FDA, Comirnaty, is not available in the US. And per a memo to the FDA from Pfizer last month, Comirnaty will not be produced for the US.
Conclusion: there is not a vaccine available in the US that is approved and not under an EUA authorization.
It's just a matter of time before the FDA fraudulently removes the EUA, then what?
Would not the Big Pharma owned FDA have already done that by now if they could?
Not ruling it out in the future?
ABA ASSOC COMMENTS ON US SUPREME COURT/JACOBSON CASE!
A BIG WIN FOR THOSE FIGHTING VACCINE MANDATES!
'THE HIGHWIRE WITH DEL BIGTREE: CENTURY-OLD JACOBSON VS. MASSACHUSETTS RULING AFFECTS VAX MANDATES' [13 min video]
https://thehighwire.com/videos/century-old-ruling-affects-vax-mandates/
PLUS!
'Judge rules in favor of St. Paul unions over COVID Vaccination mandate'!
https://www.twincities.com/2022/06/02/ramsey-county-judge-rules-in-favor-of-st-paul-unions-over-covid-vaccination-mandate/
Plus:!
"Non FDA approved covid vaccines"?
They weren't vaccines: U.S.C. 26 §§4132(a)(2) defines a vaccine as "a substance that prevents one or more diseases".
None of these in their documentation say "prevent" they say "reduces symptoms". Hence, no one is vaccinated. FDA and CDC could be tried for the Medical Fraud for both the shots, PCR tests and masks.
These shots, PCR tests and masks were forced in violation of U.S.C. 21 §'s 360bbb-3 in conjunction with 50.20.
This is the embodiment of the Nuremberg Code in the U.S. Code.
Great Attorney On Fighting Mandates has a lot of INFO, Stats, from DOD, Medicare, and HHS. Etc.
Attorney Tom Renz
https://renz-law.com/