Similar Posts
Thinking about infections and immunity
I think I have had influenza twice, based on my symptom pattern and the fact I was exposed to flu cases. But every winter I care for flu patients, so I have probably been exposed to flu viruses repeatedly each season. But I generally stay well. Why? For each infectious disease, an “infectious dose” has…
“Giant Mistake” – CDC Delays Emergency Meeting On Post-Vax Heart Inflammation Due To Juneteenth/ Zero Hedge
FRIDAY, JUN 18, 2021 – 06:30 AM Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times, The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has pushed back an emergency meeting on post-vaccination heart inflammation seen in Americans, primarily young people, because of a new federal holiday. President Joe Biden signed a bill on Thursday making June 19 a new…
Lost in Transmission — FDA Drug Information That Never Reaches Clinicians
This NEJM Article points out that, although, “Drug labels are written by drug companies, then negotiated and approved by the FDA,” still, “information gets lost between FDA review and the approved label.” What often gets lost is data on harms due to the drug. Several examples are included, and it turns out that two popular…
Israel: H1N1 flu vaccine not suitable for pregnant women, sick kids/ Haaretz
Ha’aretz tells us that Israel only has adjuvanted vaccine available currently, and The Health Ministry has decided to hold off on giving the swine flu vaccine to pregnant women and chronically ill children because vaccine stocks now in Israel contain a substance whose safety and effectiveness in pregnant women has not been fully substantiated. They…
Swine Influenza Pandemic: Important Questions and Answers
Q: How virulent is this virus?A: It appears to be about as deadly as usual flu viruses–but with the major caveat that younger people are hardest hit. CDC reports 263 deaths and 40,000 confirmed cases in the US, but expects that over 1 million have been infected. The UK reported its 15th death on July…
Wakefield Witch Hunt: What’s Up?
The BMJ, a medical journal that is more open to controversial subjects than most, just published an investigative piece and editorial claiming that Andrew Wakefield et al’s research on children with developmental and gastrointestinal disorders and the MMR vaccine was “fraud.” Wakefield’s original research paper was retracted last year by the Lancet, following a decision…
3 Comments
Comments are closed.
'THOUGHTS ON HOW TO FIGHT THEM ON VAX MANDATES'
The Religious Exemption is the incorrect approach.
Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the USC demands that employees are given the "option to accept or refuse administration" of EUA drugs.
Doe #1 v Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (DDC 2003) prohibits the military from requiring experimental drugs.
Griswold v Connecticut (1965) ruled everyone has a Constitutional right to bodily integrity.
US v Stanley (1987) ruled military personnel cannot be forced to take experimental drugs.
Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health (1990) ruled you have the right to refuse medical treatment, even if that treatment would save your life.
Washington v Harper (1990) decided "The forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person's body represents a substantial interference with that person's liberty."
US v Charters (4tth Circuit, 1987) decided "The right to be free of unwanted physical invasions has been recognized as an integral part of the individual's constitutional freedoms."
Religious exemptions will fail because the courts do not view this as a religious issue. There is enough precedent to win on the issue the drugs are EUA only. The only drug approved by the FDA, Comirnaty, is not available in the US. And per a memo to the FDA from Pfizer last month, Comirnaty will not be produced for the US.
Conclusion: there is not a vaccine available in the US that is approved and not under an EUA authorization.
It's just a matter of time before the FDA fraudulently removes the EUA, then what?
Would not the Big Pharma owned FDA have already done that by now if they could?
Not ruling it out in the future?
ABA ASSOC COMMENTS ON US SUPREME COURT/JACOBSON CASE!
A BIG WIN FOR THOSE FIGHTING VACCINE MANDATES!
'THE HIGHWIRE WITH DEL BIGTREE: CENTURY-OLD JACOBSON VS. MASSACHUSETTS RULING AFFECTS VAX MANDATES' [13 min video]
https://thehighwire.com/videos/century-old-ruling-affects-vax-mandates/
PLUS!
'Judge rules in favor of St. Paul unions over COVID Vaccination mandate'!
https://www.twincities.com/2022/06/02/ramsey-county-judge-rules-in-favor-of-st-paul-unions-over-covid-vaccination-mandate/
Plus:!
"Non FDA approved covid vaccines"?
They weren't vaccines: U.S.C. 26 §§4132(a)(2) defines a vaccine as "a substance that prevents one or more diseases".
None of these in their documentation say "prevent" they say "reduces symptoms". Hence, no one is vaccinated. FDA and CDC could be tried for the Medical Fraud for both the shots, PCR tests and masks.
These shots, PCR tests and masks were forced in violation of U.S.C. 21 §'s 360bbb-3 in conjunction with 50.20.
This is the embodiment of the Nuremberg Code in the U.S. Code.
Great Attorney On Fighting Mandates has a lot of INFO, Stats, from DOD, Medicare, and HHS. Etc.
Attorney Tom Renz
https://renz-law.com/