Similar Posts
Health problems linger for survivors of the anthrax attacks/PA’s Courier Times
The following article talks about an important finding, which I mentioned back in a 2002 NY Times interview: the people who developed inhalation anthrax (or cutaneous anthrax that became generalized) were likely to suffer from the identical symptoms as those who became very ill after anthrax vaccinations. These symptoms have now lingered for ten years…
Most Americans Think Swine Flu Pandemic Is Over, a Harvard Poll Finds / NY Times
Looks like the school-based swine flu vaccinations may have been a pilot program that CDC wants to become “routine.” Excerpts from the NYTimes article: Most Americans do not intend to get the swine flu vaccine, assume the pandemic is over and think the flu threat was overblown, according to a poll released Friday by the…
Yes you can get it again, and yes it can be transmitted by an asymptomatic person
How do I know? Because there are many examples. You don’t get it again often, and the second time is generally milder. This has happened to several of my patients and to a physician friend. You are more likely to transmit virus when you are at peak viral titers, which is after you develop symptoms. …
My radio interview on the Mickey Z show
https://mickeyz.substack.com/p/post-woke-32-why-is-the-medical-mafia
Australian parents describe flu vaccine reactions/ ABC
But many of the parents had trouble getting their children’s reactions reported to the authorities and followed up. Asking parents to report directly to government should reveal much more about adverse events following this vaccine. Hopefully, the system developed to receive reports will remain in place after this flu season, so that enhanced adverse event…
Immunocompromised children: what are their infectious risks from the unvaccinated?
Meryl Nass, MD First written in May 2015, updated in February 2019 In April-May 2015 there were multiple news articles, and testimonies in the Maine and Vermont legislatures, about the need to impose vaccine mandates to protect immunocompromised children.[1] [2] I attended the vaccine bills’ hearing in Augusta, Maine on May 11, which lasted into the…
3 Comments
Comments are closed.
'THOUGHTS ON HOW TO FIGHT THEM ON VAX MANDATES'
The Religious Exemption is the incorrect approach.
Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the USC demands that employees are given the "option to accept or refuse administration" of EUA drugs.
Doe #1 v Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (DDC 2003) prohibits the military from requiring experimental drugs.
Griswold v Connecticut (1965) ruled everyone has a Constitutional right to bodily integrity.
US v Stanley (1987) ruled military personnel cannot be forced to take experimental drugs.
Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health (1990) ruled you have the right to refuse medical treatment, even if that treatment would save your life.
Washington v Harper (1990) decided "The forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person's body represents a substantial interference with that person's liberty."
US v Charters (4tth Circuit, 1987) decided "The right to be free of unwanted physical invasions has been recognized as an integral part of the individual's constitutional freedoms."
Religious exemptions will fail because the courts do not view this as a religious issue. There is enough precedent to win on the issue the drugs are EUA only. The only drug approved by the FDA, Comirnaty, is not available in the US. And per a memo to the FDA from Pfizer last month, Comirnaty will not be produced for the US.
Conclusion: there is not a vaccine available in the US that is approved and not under an EUA authorization.
It's just a matter of time before the FDA fraudulently removes the EUA, then what?
Would not the Big Pharma owned FDA have already done that by now if they could?
Not ruling it out in the future?
ABA ASSOC COMMENTS ON US SUPREME COURT/JACOBSON CASE!
A BIG WIN FOR THOSE FIGHTING VACCINE MANDATES!
'THE HIGHWIRE WITH DEL BIGTREE: CENTURY-OLD JACOBSON VS. MASSACHUSETTS RULING AFFECTS VAX MANDATES' [13 min video]
https://thehighwire.com/videos/century-old-ruling-affects-vax-mandates/
PLUS!
'Judge rules in favor of St. Paul unions over COVID Vaccination mandate'!
https://www.twincities.com/2022/06/02/ramsey-county-judge-rules-in-favor-of-st-paul-unions-over-covid-vaccination-mandate/
Plus:!
"Non FDA approved covid vaccines"?
They weren't vaccines: U.S.C. 26 §§4132(a)(2) defines a vaccine as "a substance that prevents one or more diseases".
None of these in their documentation say "prevent" they say "reduces symptoms". Hence, no one is vaccinated. FDA and CDC could be tried for the Medical Fraud for both the shots, PCR tests and masks.
These shots, PCR tests and masks were forced in violation of U.S.C. 21 §'s 360bbb-3 in conjunction with 50.20.
This is the embodiment of the Nuremberg Code in the U.S. Code.
Great Attorney On Fighting Mandates has a lot of INFO, Stats, from DOD, Medicare, and HHS. Etc.
Attorney Tom Renz
https://renz-law.com/