Similar Posts
Scientific impossibility: Did FBI get their man in Bruce Ivins?
“Bruce Ivins was a cold-blooded murderer, a deranged psycho-killer, who in the fall of 2001, cooked up a virulent batch of powdered anthrax, drove to Princeton, N.J., and mailed letters loaded with the lethal mix to five news organizations and two U.S. senators. At least, that’s what the FBI says. The letters infected 22 people,…
My interview September 4, 2022 with Creative Destruction Media re the new, untested COVID Bivalent boosters, with Christine Dolan
Sasha Latypova did the first thirty minutes and I did the second thirty minutes. I unpack the new booster authorization and approval of the rollout. Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech versions of the new boosters contain the old vaccine and a new vaccine that contains mRNA coding for a BA.5 omicron spike. Neither vaccine has had any…
Old WP editorial requesting Independent Commission or DOJ IG review of FBI anthrax case
From an Editorial in the December 1, 2008 Washington Post: …The new attorney general also should ensure that an independent commission or the inspector general review the anthrax investigation. In the summer, the FBI identified Fort Detrick scientist Bruce E. Ivins as the lone suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks that killed five and sickened…
White House Asks CDC to Study How Many Have Died After COVID Vaccine Shots/Jan 28 Daily Beast
Below, I am including a complete article from the Daily Beast, because I meant to blog more about it when it came out but didn’t, and because it is extremely important in understanding the methods used by our public health agencies, especially CDC, to avoid collecting information, so they won’t have to deal with it. …
Study Links Plant Damage to Nanoparticles/NY Times blog
Thanks to Teresa Binstock for this tip– An exposure to nano-scale copper oxide particles stunted the shoots and roots of radishes and two species of rye grass.
More than 150 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms/ Brownstone Institute
It is not unreasonable to conclude that surgical and cloth masks, used as they currently are being used (without other forms of PPE protection), have no impact on controlling the transmission of Covid-19 virus. Current evidence implies that face masks can be actually harmful. The body of evidence indicates that face masks are largely ineffective. …
One Comment
Comments are closed.
I couldn’t find a corroborating report on this. I don’t doubt its veracity but in the age of corporate censorship, I try to find like accounts.