More details revealed
A local Maryland paper provides new information from a colleague who worked at USAMRIID with Ivins through 2007, and published USAMRIID’s official response to questions.
Similar Posts
Investigating the origin of SARS-CoV-2: Interview with Professor Richard Ebright/Independent Science News
This interview is from late March, but has not gotten the attention it deserves. Professor Ebright is extremely knowledgeable about the issue of biosafety in high containment labs and about high risk (aka Gain of Function aka biological warfare research). Here is a taste of the interview: … The Open Letter explains in detail the…
WHO recommends that countries “use ones containing adjuvants”/ Associated Press
Per the AP: “…To increase the global supply of swine flu vaccines, WHO recommends that countries use ones containing adjuvants, a component that stretches the vaccine’s active ingredient and boosts the body’s immune response. Adjuvants are commonly used in flu vaccines in Europe, [only in those over 65, and only in some countries–Nass] but there…
Senator Grassley asks for Answers on Amerithrax Investigation
On August 7, 2008 Senator Grassley wrote to Attorney General Mukasey and FBI Director Mueller asking them to answer 18 excellent questions about their investigation.
FDA Pretends it Cares–but leaves out the most important information
PHARMACOVIGILANCE: the practice of monitoring the effects of medical drugs after they have been licensed for use, especially in order to identify and evaluate previously unreported adverse reactions. Pages 34-35 of the FDA review of Pfizer’s data for the 5-11 year olds provides the pretense of truly caring about identifying and quantifying adverse events from…
Farmers, Fishermen and Citizens do some serious protesting against the demand to drastically cut down livestock production for a green agenda, pushed by Bill Gates’ $$.
Vaccine Impact Farmers Across Europe Protest in Solidarity with Dutch Farmers as Green Agenda Takes Away Their Farms with Food Shortages Looming AdminM Jul 7 by Brian ShilhavyEditor, Health Impact News If you haven’t figured out yet that government policies designed to transition to the New Green World Order are an assault on humanity with the goal of reducing…
WHO challenged at public hearing on the handling of the Swine Flu pandemic/ Council of Europe
From the Council of Europe’s website: “Are decisions on pandemics taken on the best scientific evidence only?” was the question asked today at a public hearing of PACE’s Committee on Social, Health and Family Affairs into the handling of the H1N1 pandemic. The World Health Organisation’s flu chief defended his organisation, saying its advice was…
4 Comments
Comments are closed.
I’ve been thinking about how the FBI should have approached the case.
It’s pretty simple: look for spores. The perp unavoidably left a trail of spores: a ton of spores where the anthrax was made (and/or where the envelopes were filled), likely spores in the perp’s car, etc. We know that the letters were leaking spores like crazy, despite being sealed with tape.
There are a limited number of likely places where the anthrax could have been made, a limited number of people who could have done it. The FBI could have checked every likely place (including USAMRIID of course) and every likely person’s car for spores and cracked the case within a matter of days.
As they say in the comic books, “that would have been too easy”.
The only thing the FBI still has right now is that Bruce Ivins was in mental health treatment and the public’s ignorance about that.
Bruce Ivins showed good insight into his situation and did exactly what you’re supposed to do when you realize that your thinking is off. He sought treatment and he reached out to friends.
He’s not the type of person that was so unaware of his challenges that he could just act out all over other people. The FBI can’t have it both ways, although they do try.
FBI had, then tossed anthrax type used in attacks
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/18/AR2008081801274.html