Similar Posts
My interview with Tommy Carrigan
https://rumble.com/vswuxy-tpc-673-dr.-meryl-nass-government-abuse-in-medicine.html
Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination in healthcare workers: a systematic review.
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Dec;79(4):279-86. Abstract is here. Ng AN, Lai CK. Infectious Disease Control Training Centre, Hospital Authority/Infection Control Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR, China. ngngaiming@gmail.com Abstract Vaccination is considered a key measure to protect vulnerable groups against influenza infection. The objectives of this review are to determine…
Not again ,Twitter. Locked out for a week. So much for the Elon Musk effect.
Hi MERYL NASS, MD, Your account, @NassMeryl has been locked for violating the Twitter Rules. Specifically for: Violating the policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19. We understand that during times of crisis and instability, it is difficult to know what to do to keep yourself and your loved ones…
Shameless, US insists UN report implicates Assad–except it doesn’t / UN
From the BBC: US and UK insist UN chemicals report ‘blames Syria’ The US, UK and France say a UN report confirming a chemical weapons attack in Damascus has vindicated their stance that Syria was to blame. The US and UK ambassadors to the UN said technical details showed only the regime could have been…
The COVID vaccine injured tell their stories
https://thehighwire.com/videos/live-in-d-c-expert-panel-on-medical-mandates-vaccine-injuries/ Ron Johnson’s hosted an event in DC on Tuesday where the vaccine injured and their relatives were able to tell their story. I missed it due to my live-blog. Del Bigtree captured the event.
Senator Grassley asks for Answers on Amerithrax Investigation
On August 7, 2008 Senator Grassley wrote to Attorney General Mukasey and FBI Director Mueller asking them to answer 18 excellent questions about their investigation.
One Comment
Comments are closed.
Seems it has been through the peer-review process, as it is designated as "Withdrawn Article In Press" on ScienceDirect.
"The Publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated."
The paper has already been tweeted about more than 18,000 times, so I think Elsevier will get a big, black eye for attempting to censor it.