Freedom-loving Scotsmen protested the National Museum’s Pro-Globalism, Pro-Vaccine, Pro-W.H.O. exhibit

In a daring move, a banner was hung from the museum's roof

Original URL: https://merylnass.substack.com/p/freedom-loving-scotsmen-protested

https://t.me/DissidentsScotland/7

This is more disgusting than I realized. Wonder who paid for this traveling exhibit designed to lionize COVID vaccinations and quell vaccine hesitancy? Read all about it:

Misuse of a museum – naked covid propaganda masquerading as science

Discussion of the exhibit (same link as above):

Misuse of a museum – naked covid propaganda masquerading as science

Similar Posts

Ouch! How many times did Tim Walz lie about his past in the VP debate? And he blamed it on being a “knucklehead” (a dummie–well, we don’t need any more of those in the White House, either)

Is Walz replacing Fauci as the public figure to whom lies come most naturally?

Is Walz replacing Fauci as the public figure to whom lies come most naturally?

More lies being spread about the WHO treaties by elected US officials to their constituents

I wonder if the legislators will be angry when they learn they are repeating lies? Or is that par for the course? Ask Senator Dick Durbin to correct his misrepresentations.

I wonder if the legislators will be angry when they learn they are repeating lies? Or is that par for the course? Ask Senator Dick Durbin to correct his misrepresentations.

Consider telling the US government what you think about the WHO’s power grab. Get it on record.

The digital passports, the border closures, quarantines, lockdowns and restriction of medications during a pandemic: it is all there in the IHR amendments. And new to the IHRs: they will be enforced.

The digital passports, the border closures, quarantines, lockdowns and restriction of medications during a pandemic: it is all there in the IHR amendments. And new to the IHRs: they will be enforced.

The narrative shifts: Treaty must be approved because it is NOW or NEVER. That is because there is nothing in it that any sane person might want. Thus: emphasize process not product

The Lancet editors can no longer edit: "costs have been spent." My comments in italics. They are getting desperate. Note the vague terminology regarding the treaty's ephemeral benefits

The Lancet editors can no longer edit: “costs have been spent.” My comments in italics. They are getting desperate. Note the vague terminology regarding the treaty’s ephemeral benefits