Rebutting bizarre assertions about the WHO’s negotiations.
Hope this does not bore you but it is important to clear things up.
The following grossly wrong assertions were made 2 days ago by someone we had trusted:
“… you should realize the following:
-
The WHO negotiations are NOT an attack on national sovereignty.
-
The WHO negotiations are NOT about mandates or lockdowns.
-
The WHO negotiations are NOT about attempting to seize control of the doctor-patient relationship.
-
The WHO negotiations are NOT a plot that has been planned and is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party
-
The WHO negotiations will NOT be countered by standing up for states’ rights, or by state nullification.”
But they are simply wrong and there has been no correction or clarification.
-
The
WHO Treaty claims it is not an attack on sovereignty, but what else can
you call it when the WHO will get to declare emergencies and then
dictate to 196 nations what they must do; how much they must spend;
whether to use specific drugs or vaccines, etc? I dealt with this
yesterday here. -
Article
18 of the International Health Regulations gives the WHO, once the word
“binding” that has been added in an amendment has been approved, the
power to order and enforce vaccine mandates and lockdowns.
The
provisions in both the Treaty and Amendments dictate censorship of
health “misinformation and disinformation” thus controlling what
information your doctor can access. Article 43 paragraph 4 in the Amendments
gives the WHO the right to order that certain drugs be withheld during a
declared public health emergency. That seems like an uncountenanceable
intrusion into the doctor-patient relationship to me.
-
I cannot comment on the role of the Chinese since I don’t know what it is
-
I just explained in the last post why
standing up for the rights of states to regulate health is critically
important, and pointed out that the executive branch lacks the authority
to delegate any powers to the WHO over American citizens, in any event.
The issue of where power lies and who has the power to delegate it to the WHO is critically important for us all.
This is the reason why the EU suddenly asserted that its competence in
health is high and the WHO asserted that it had the authority to
negotiate with the EU, despite the fact the EU is not a member of the
WHO: it is an attempt to supercede individual European nations’
authority and negotiate a transfer of power from all 27 member nations
to the WHO. Precisely what our federal government is doing.
This
was a very important week, in which the legal issues came into sharp
focus and we the people felt hopeful that we could evade the legal traps
that have been set.
And that was when the “Red Herrings”
post appeared on March 29, throwing large numbers of people into a
tizzy of confusion. Was our movement getting too strong, and was
long-established trust risked to finally try and derail us?
The
March 7, 2024 version of the Treaty is the same repackaged tyranny that
was found in the 6 earlier versions. Don’t get confused and don’t give
up.