Similar Posts
Cost, need questioned in $433-million smallpox drug deal // aka Biodefense: Giving from the 99% to the 1% / LA Times
UPDATE: Senator Claire McCaskill calls for DHHS IG to investigate the government’s sole-source contract with Siga. If you are unconvinced that government seeks ways to buy products from “insider” companies that tithe to those at the center of government, read David Willman’s article in today’s LA Times. A few grams of anthrax, grown from stock…
Get the infection, take the medicine, get over it and get durable immunity to variants. Not so for the poor vaccinated population, whose immunity against variants is poor/ Cell journal
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(21)00298-1 Highlights Numerous variants of SARS-CoV-2 harboring mutations in spike have arisen globally mRNA vaccines elicit potent neutralizing activity against homologous pseudovirus Cross-neutralization of strains with receptor binding domain (RBD) mutations is poor Both RBD and non-RBD mutations mediate escape from vaccine-induced humoral immunity Summary Vaccination elicits immune responses capable of potently neutralizing SARS-CoV-2. However,…
CDC Ignores Seizure Risk of Flu Vaccines/ CDC
Doctors in the UK and Australia have been instructed not to give flu vaccines this year to children under five years old. As reported by the Telegraph: The letter to all GPs from Prof David Salisbury, said: “Epidemiological information from Australia indicates that there has been a higher than expected increase in febrile convulsions in…
Building Markets, Avoiding Liability: a 2004 Example of Pandemic-Mongering/ Science
Here is a typical piece of industry hype on the dangers of a future pandemic, the need to build a bigger industrial base for vaccine production and the need to stockpile Tamiflu. But it didn’t appear in an industry publication; instead it was published in Science, the US’s premier scientific journal. The title is INFLUENZA:…
After smearing me and the film Plandemic 2 for saying that SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab, Politifact backtracks on the origin of SARS-Cov-2
Here is Politifact quoting me from the film Pandemic, which Politifact then disputed by citing a March 17, 2020 Nature Medicine article, which I had mentioned in the film as being bogus. Now, it seems, many have awakened, after being spoon-fed an analysis of the facts by Nicholas Wade, and realized the Nature Medicine paper makes…
Syria vs US Chemical Weapons Stockpiles–Same Agents, US supply 3 times larger
The US government acknowledges that chemical weapons remain at two US sites, where they will be destroyed by 2023. The sites are Kentucky’s Blue Grass Army Depot and Colorado’s Pueblo Chemical Depot. Army documents reveal that Pueblo houses 2,611 tons of mustard agent. The Blue Grass Army Depot houses 523 tons of sarin, VX and mustard agent. According…
9 Comments
Comments are closed.


Are the turquoise bars indicative of later downward revisions (like with economic statistics)?
I guess I'm unsure why there are still turquoise bars several weeks later when the category is listed as "current week."
I'd love to know more about this as I don't remember seeing them before.
Thanks, Dr. Nass
Are the turquoise bars indicative of later downward revisions (like with economic statistics)?
I guess I'm unsure why there are still turquoise bars several weeks later when the category is listed as "current week."
I'd love to know more about this as I don't remember seeing them before.
Thanks, Dr. Nass
My understanding is that the turquoise bars are upward revisions to deaths that CDC was notified about late (occurring beyond a week earlier). Still , one can see that the death toll in children is relatively low for a flu season.
CDC is now saying that deaths in the elderly are quite high this season, but because deaths in elders are not tracked individually, as they are for children, and CDC makes guesses based on composite respiratory deaths from viral and bacterial diseases, it is difficult to know what infection(s) are contributing to higher deaths in elders.
Thanks, Dr. Nass. the CDC info your state was corroborated by our SDH Subject Matter Expert on respiratory diseases. She presented on Flu and H1N1
to our Infectious Epi class I'm in this past week (Mon)
She admitted the 36,000/year mortality statistics were based on pretty flimsy data (which I was surprised by). She was very open and honest with our class about limitations and whatnot (and I asked a lot of questions).
Here's some highlights (my notes from class) if it's interesting for you or your readers:
What constitutes an influenza death? must have flu positive test and must have died (that’s it??); don’t need to have died from flu (this will seriously overstate); now SDH is pulling death certificate deaths and going back (risk to this in overstating).
Next year we’re changing our communicable dis rule.
Before –no rule 2003 – in TX and CO huge amt of pediatric deaths in the winter; looked into it and found that flu was causing all of these
2004 – CSTE – proposed that all pediatric deaths are reportable, nationally notifiable (ISDH has to be held accountable); so they recommended
2005 – PED (pediatric) deaths nationally notifiable. Her question was what about the other people? CSTE was less concerned about elderly deaths? Richards – we have a rule on the book that should be enforceable? If you have a rule – all physicians, hospitals, and ;
2006 – 6 states hopped on board. Emergency Rule:
2013 – hardly any PED deaths; mostly elderly. IN has more data; more outbreaks in Long-term care facilities.
Phys, hosp – must report any human that dies with a positive test (including rapid-test and ANY test, other than a serology);
death would be in the county they reside.
– many times flu was diagnosed
– death certificate data (problem – usually takes 2-3 years to “approve” death statistics).
Her range for annual flu mortality btwn 3k and 36,000k
Question – how can one tell if the flu is clinical or subclinical or a consequence of other underlying medical conditions.
Ans: can’t. Data is very poor.
Send it out to county health dept to confirm
2013 – Of the 44 deaths, more than 50% were vaccinated (a little high). This makes the efficacy much less.
Tons more, and I'd be willing to send the ppt to anyone who wants info from the SDH'sNext year we’re changing our communicable dis rule.
Before –no rule 2003 – in TX and CO huge amt of pediatric deaths in the winter; looked into it and found that flu was causing all of these
2004 – CSTE – proposed that all pediatric deaths are reportable, nationally notifiable (ISDH has to be held accountable); so they recommended
2005 – PED (pediatric) deaths nationally notifiable. Her question was what about the other people? CSTE was less concerned about elderly deaths? Richards – we have a rule on the book that should be enforceable? If you have a rule – all physicians, hospitals, and ;
2006 – 6 states hopped on board. Emergency Rule:
2013 – hardly any PED deaths; mostly elderly. IN has more data; more outbreaks in Long-term care facilities.
Phys, hosp – must report any human that dies with a positive test (including rapid-test and ANY test, other than a serology); death would be in the county they reside.
– many times flu was diagnosed
– death certificate data (problem – usually takes 2-3 years to “approve” death statistics).
Her range for annual flu mortality – 3k – 36,000k –
Question – how can one tell if the flu is clinical or subclinical or a consequence of otNext year we’re changing our communicable dis rule.
Before –no rule 2003 – in TX and CO huge amt of pediNext year we’re changing our communicable dis rule.
Before –no rule 2003 – in TX and CO huge amt of pediatric deaths in the winter; looked into it and found that flu was causing all of these
Cot'd.
2004 – CSTE – proposed that all pediatric deaths are reportable, nationally notifiable (ISDH has to be held accountable); so they recommended
2005 – PED (pediatric) deaths nationally notifiable. Her question was what about the other people? CSTE was less concerned about elderly deaths? Richards – we have a rule on the book that should be enforceable? If you have a rule – all physicians, hospitals, and ;
2006 – 6 states hopped on board. Emergency Rule:
2013 – hardly any PED deaths; mostly elderly. IN has more data; more outbreaks in Long-term care facilities.
Phys, hosp – must report any human that dies with a positive test (including rapid-test and ANY test, other than a serology); death would be in the county they reside.
– many times flu was diagnosed
– death certificate data (problem – usually takes 2-3 years to “approve” death statistics).
Her range for annual flu mortality – 3k – 36,000k –
Question – how can one tell if the flu is clinical or subclinical or a consequence of other underlying medical conditions. Ans: can’t. Data is very poor.
Send it out to county health dept to confirm
2013 – Of the 44 deaths, more than 50% were vaccinated (a little high). This makes the efficacy much less.
atric deaths in the winter; looked into it and found that flu was causing all of these
2004 – CSTE – proposed that all pediatric deaths are reportable, nationally notifiable (ISDH has to be held accountable); so they recommended
2005 – PED (pediatric) deaths nationally notifiable. Her question was what about the other people? CSTE was less concerned about elderly deaths? Richards – we have a rule on the book that should be enforceable? If you have a rule – all physicians, hospitals, and ;
2006 – 6 states hopped on board. Emergency Rule:
2013 – hardly any PED deaths; mostly elderly. IN has more data; more outbreaks in Long-term care facilities.
Phys, hosp – must report any human that dies with a positive test (including rapid-test and ANY test, other than a serology); death would be in the county they reside.
– many times flu was diagnosed
– death certificate data (problem – usually takes 2-3 years to “approve” death statistics).
Her range for annual flu mortality – 3k – 36,000k –
Question – how can one tell if the flu is clinical or subclinical or a consequence of other underlying medical conditions. Ans: can’t. Data is very poor.
Send it out to county health dept to confirm
2013 – Of the 44 deaths, more than 50% were vaccinated (a little high). This makes the efficacy much less.
her underlying medical conditions. Ans: can’t. Data is very poor.
Send it out to county health dept to confirm
2013 – Of the 44 deaths, more than 50% were vaccinated (a little high). This makes the efficacy much less.
mouth on what current and future policies and rules are looking like, as well as some of the science.
Enjoy.
Thanks for this discussion.
I think this issue of the number of flu deaths in children and adults is very important. Pediatric deaths are rarely missed: they are required to be sent to state health departments, and investigated if they occur at home. So the case numbers should be pretty good.
Yet CDC multiplied the reported pediatric deaths in 2009-10 to create an estimate of deaths. This multiplication will overestimate cases.
In adults, we simply do not know what the flu death rate is, we cannot calculate benefit and we collect almost no data on flu vaccine adverse events. So no risk-benefit analysis can be performed.
According to longstanding public health principles, you only create a public health program (like flu vaccination recommendations for everyone over 6 months in the US) if there is a large benefit compared to risk and cost. Yet that has never been done in the US…and almost no other countries recommend flu vaccine for more than high risk groups.
Somehow those previous messages got all jumbled up. Strange, I did a simple copy and paste to make one message into two. Sorry about that.
Do you remember the multiplication factor they used in 2009-10 and how they justified that number?
Thanks so much for sharing your perspective on here. I've been learning from you now for some 3-4 years. I can ask you questions that I can only ask very infrequently in class and with a lot of diplomacy, because of the religion surrounding these things.
Here is a discussion on CDC's website about it estimates. My reading of this indicates they are cagey about providing a model or algorithm for the estimates they make, instead claiming to review various types of figures and then creating an estimate…but how exactly this is done is not shared.
I do not believe they provided a multiplication factor for the pedi deaths, but since all pedi deaths must be reported, why should there be any factor applied to this total to get a larger estimate?
Here is the URL:
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htm