Similar Posts
Republican AGs Say There Is No Federal Vaccine Mandate for Private Workers, Vow to Sue/Epoch Times
President Joe Biden speaks about COVID-19 vaccine booster shots in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington on Sept. 24, 2021. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters) EXECUTIVE BRANCH BY JACK PHILLIPS October 17, 2021 Updated: October 18, 2021 biggersmaller Several Republican attorneys general have said that President Joe Biden’s federal mandate for COVID-19 vaccinations hasn’t yet…
Flu Shots: The more you get, the worse they work?/ CIDRAP
Study: Getting flu shots 2 years in a row may lower protection Robert Roos News Editor a Mar 1, 2013 (CIDRAP News) – Experts are puzzled by a new study in which influenza vaccination seemed to provide little or no protection against flu in the 2010-11 season—and in which the only participants who seemed to benefit…
Healthcare worker mandate shot down nationwide.
https://www.theadvertiser.com/story/news/2021/11/30/louisiana-federal-judge-blocks-biden-national-covid-vaccine-mandate-healthcare-workers/8806478002/ https://dojmt.gov/federal-judge-grants-montanas-request-for-injunction-on-cms-vaccine-mandate/ Federal Judge Grants Montana’s Request For Injunction On CMS Vaccine Mandate Aaron FlintPublished: November 29, 2021 Louisiana federal judge blocks nationwide COVID vaccine mandate for health care workers https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/MTAG/2021/11/30/file_attachments/2008888/Nationwide%20Injunction%20-%20CMS%20mandate.pdf Greg Hilburn Lafayette Daily Advertiser
On October 22, FDA had an advisory meeting to discuss Covid vaccines in general.. The presenters were upbeat, showing loads of new data sets that would-be used to monitor the safety of Covid vaccines
Friday, July 16, 2021. . REPOST FDA promised very extensive surveillance for adverse effects of Covid vaccines–presentation to FDA VRBPAC Advisory Committee, October 22, 2020 https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download It should be apparent that FDA was aware by October 22, 2020 of many of the side effects of Covid vaccines that the public only learned about later. It…
Medical societies fight CMS efforts to make CME funding more transparent
On February 9, 2012, I wrote about how Merck manages to evade FDA regulations on advertising by funneling money through third party intermediaries: educational institutions and education/PR companies. These third parties then pay doctors to provide advertising to other professionals in the form of continuing medical education. Merck can then have the doctors speak about…
August 15 Covid deaths, hospitalizations and ICU stays
This is just another update from the CDC and NY Times. Remember that the CDC websites now lists deaths “with COVID” and has no category of deaths due to COVID. Those hospitalized are also “with” COVID not necessarily “due to” COVID. What is obvious is that COVID cases in the ICUs have been at pandemic…
One Comment
Comments are closed.
"Covid Vaccines 'Increase Risk of Heart-Related Deaths by Up to 50%', Lancet Analysis of Trial Data Finds!"
A preprint study (not yet peer-reviewed) in the Lancet has analysed the mortality data from the vaccine trials and made the shocking finding that mRNA vaccines had “no effect on overall mortality”. Worse, it found the risk of non-Covid, non-accident mortality actually increased by 17% (relative risk 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-2.05). Furthermore, a full 50% of the non-Covid deaths (27 out of 54) were cardiovascular and the relative risk of such death was 45% higher in the vaccine arm (relative risk 1.45, CI 0.67-3.13), breaking down to 50% higher for Pfizer and 40% higher for Moderna (with wide confidence intervals).
These are clearly alarming findings. But they go oddly unremarked upon in the paper. This is presumably due to the authors being wary of criticising the vaccines in order to be published. If so, it is disappointing that this is thought (probably correctly) to be necessary and indicates how absurdly political vaccine research has become. While the results are not, in this study, statistically significant, in that the confidence intervals are wide and include 1.0, the effect size is large and, in the context of wider concerns about adverse effects of mRNA vaccines on the cardiovascular system, warrant some comment, if only to flag them up and say larger studies are needed to see if statistical significance obtains.
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/