Similar Posts

Blinded by the Science: Research Advisory Committee Report Includes Data from 9 Studies of Anthrax Vaccine and Gulf Illnesses

And every one of the nine studies found a relationship between receiving anthrax vaccine and developing symptoms of Gulf War Syndrome. In eight of the nine studies, the relationship was statistically significant. The study with non-significant results was partly retracted by the authors (from the group associated with Simon Wessely, a UK psychiatrist and controversial…

Who Mailed the Anthrax Letters?/ NY Times Editorial

Today’s NY Times wants to know if the FBI’s evidence — linking Bruce Ivins to the anthrax letters — really holds up.  Frontline/ProPublica/McClatchy last week informed us, after reviewing thousands of FBI documents obtained through FOIA, that the FBI misled us.  Ivins’ late-night hours at the lab in September-October 2001 were not really that different…

The US case and death graphs weren’t scary enough, I guess

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/08/05/coronavirus-covid-live-updates-us So now the WaPO is showing WORLDWIDE Covid case and death numbers, which allows the graph of cases to have that scary parabolic slope.  Google won’t let me input the graph, even after laundering it through my photos app, but you can see it at the URL above. Meanwhile at the NY Times, whose…

Childrens Health Defense has prepared an ebook and a 2-pager to help educate on vaccinations

 Ebook: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ebook-sign-up/free-ebook-covid-19-treatment-and-vaccine-decisions-from-a-pediatric-perspective-evaluating-the-risks-and-benefits-for-your-child-or-adolescent-beyond-cdc-fda-or-who-proclamations/ 2 sided flyer on COVID vaccines: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Top-10-things-you-need-to-know-about-COVID-19-Vaccines-FINAL.pdf

One Comment

  1. "Covid Vaccines 'Increase Risk of Heart-Related Deaths by Up to 50%', Lancet Analysis of Trial Data Finds!"

    A preprint study (not yet peer-reviewed) in the Lancet has analysed the mortality data from the vaccine trials and made the shocking finding that mRNA vaccines had “no effect on overall mortality”. Worse, it found the risk of non-Covid, non-accident mortality actually increased by 17% (relative risk 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-2.05). Furthermore, a full 50% of the non-Covid deaths (27 out of 54) were cardiovascular and the relative risk of such death was 45% higher in the vaccine arm (relative risk 1.45, CI 0.67-3.13), breaking down to 50% higher for Pfizer and 40% higher for Moderna (with wide confidence intervals).

    These are clearly alarming findings. But they go oddly unremarked upon in the paper. This is presumably due to the authors being wary of criticising the vaccines in order to be published. If so, it is disappointing that this is thought (probably correctly) to be necessary and indicates how absurdly political vaccine research has become. While the results are not, in this study, statistically significant, in that the confidence intervals are wide and include 1.0, the effect size is large and, in the context of wider concerns about adverse effects of mRNA vaccines on the cardiovascular system, warrant some comment, if only to flag them up and say larger studies are needed to see if statistical significance obtains.

    https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/

Comments are closed.